Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW surveying authorities (Was: Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=)

2013-01-26 Thread Nick Whitelegg
Sorry - to follow that up, contours aren't available for the whole of the area.  I'll try and sort this out but might be some time as I don't have the files to hand. Nick -Nick Whitelegg wrote: - To: Adam Hoyle From: Nick Whitelegg Date: 26/01/2013 03:32PM Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.o

Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW surveying authorities (Was: Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=)

2013-01-26 Thread Nick Whitelegg
OK should have both Oxfordshire and Bucks now. (discovered the latter was also on geofabrik) It may take some time to render first time you try somewhere out, as it's got to generate the geojson from the database... but the geojson is now cached making it much faster on subsequent requests. N

Re: [Talk-GB] Invisible/impassable rights-of-way

2013-01-26 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:56:53 + Jonathan Harley wrote: Hello Jonathan, >Actually, AIUI, the landowner can't be forced to, but if the landowner >won't reinstate and clear the path, the council must. The council can >then charge the full cost of them doing so to the landowner - which is >lik

Re: [Talk-GB] Invisible/impassable rights-of-way

2013-01-26 Thread Jonathan Harley
On 26/01/13 14:41, Brad Rogers wrote: John Aldridge wrote: In one case, the location of the path is clear, because it runs between two walls and the green "Public Footpath" signs are present, but a section of it has become completely and densely overgrown with brambles. It also has a large pile

Re: [Talk-GB] Invisible/impassable rights-of-way

2013-01-26 Thread Brad Rogers
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:24:44 + John Aldridge wrote: Hello John, >In one case, the location of the path is clear, because it runs between >two walls and the green "Public Footpath" signs are present, but a >section of it has become completely and densely overgrown with >brambles. It also ha