I did a little bit of work early this morning on this for County Durham but
its very rough and nowhere near 100% accurate but gives a good idea of the
status of PRoW mapped in the area.
If you have a look at the 2 images linked below they show PRoW in County
Durham, one with background mapping,
I created this in QGIS comparing the OSM data to the PRoW released from
Durham County Council, I created a special query using intersects. This is
why it's not perfectly accurate because if an OSM mapped math intersected
with the PRoW data it would show up green, even though it may not be that
Dudley Ibbett wrote:
I'm trying to make use of the row files on rowmaps for derbyshire and
staffordshire and and merging these with and osm map file to then produce
maps that can highlight which paths are and aren't mapped.
Thanks for doing this.
One suggestion - it would be great if the
Hmm, I have sitting on my desktop a whole load of QGIS analyses of OSM
designation=* against the DCC rowmap TAB file, but as I'm on my way to SotM
Baltics wont write this up until I get back.
I haven't looked in detail, but basic use of buffers seems to grab most
matching footpaths (buffer OSM
I have tried increasing the memory allocated to JOSM but it is still a very
slow process. The most convenient way for me would be to download the
Geofrabik file for derbyshire when I need and update but it looks like a merge
with the derbyshire prow will take an hour or more at the current
Overview of missing Derbyshire footpaths:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/9390856924/
Jerry
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I have sitting on my desktop a whole load of QGIS analyses of OSM
designation=* against the DCC rowmap TAB file, but as
6 matches
Mail list logo
