On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>
>
>
> > Can you point us to some further reading about this "admin_ref"
>
> > tag?
>
> > The wiki isn't telling me about it. If there is indeed a consensus
>
> > then it'd be nice for it to be documented!
>
>
>
> A wiki search for admin_re
UGH ! :((
"Noble" - in my case Karen. Died April, last year (or was it the year
before) - cancer. I've just been OSMing in her area - she was an infamous
author - amongst her 'titles' is The Highway Code - the official book blah
blah - the official title of the book. What HMSO turn out now: "The
O
This came up in discussions at the Edinburgh pub Meetup last night, and
those there (quite a few of the prominent mappers in Scotland) agreed that
eg U1234 should be on either admin_ref or official_ref (whichever was most
popular) And not on the main ref tag.
Also perhaps a case for not rendering
On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach wrote:
> Dan wrote:
>> Can you point us to some further reading about this "admin_ref"
>> tag?
>> The wiki isn't telling me about it. If there is indeed a consensus
>> then it'd be nice for it to be documented!
>
> A wiki search for admin_ref finds
>
> http://wi
Dan wrote:
> Can you point us to some further reading about this "admin_ref"
> tag?
> The wiki isn't telling me about it. If there is indeed a consensus
> then it'd be nice for it to be documented!
A wiki search for admin_ref finds
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Ta
2015-03-18 15:54 GMT+00:00 :
>
>
> On Wed Mar 18 15:38:13 2015 GMT, Pmailkeey . wrote:
>> >
>> U-numbers are used publicly - most often on temporary planning development
>> notices attached to street lights etc.
>>
> If they are not signed, then they do not belong in the ref tag.
>
> The consensus
On Wed Mar 18 15:38:13 2015 GMT, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> >
> U-numbers are used publicly - most often on temporary planning development
> notices attached to street lights etc.
>
If they are not signed, then they do not belong in the ref tag.
The consensus is that such information belongs in an a
On 18 March 2015 at 09:58, Matt Williams wrote:
> On 18 March 2015 at 09:13, Paul Sladen wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> >> Anyone know why the search facility can't find "Waingatebridge
> Cottages" ?
> >
> > Presumably this terrace in the Lake District which has no 'name=';
Hi there,
SK 53 (sk53@gmail.com) invites you to participate in the Doodle
poll "East Midlands Mapping Meetup May."
SK 53 says:
Another footpath focussed mapping day in the East Midlands.
For
more details see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Mapping_Meetup
At
present 9th
3 of us met on Saturday (myself, SomeoneElse and Mot from
Sheffield/Rotherham) to do some footpath mapping in the far north of
Nottinghamshire: still an under-mapped area despite a lot of recent work by
Nigel Greens in particular.
I haven't calculated how many km of new paths (or existing paths) h
"As part of ongoing moves to make our data even more accessible and easier
for start-ups and others to understand and use, we are pleased to announce
that following close work with The National Archives we have now adopted
the Open Government Licence (OGL) version 3.0 in place of our OS OpenData
On 18 March 2015 at 09:13, Paul Sladen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
>> Anyone know why the search facility can't find "Waingatebridge Cottages" ?
>
> Presumably this terrace in the Lake District which has no 'name=';
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314851241
>
> and whic
Well done Jonathan! You've motivated me to go out and survey the remaining
4 roads in Dudley so we can have 100% coverge of the West Midlands. Does
anyone else have any tales of what the Quarterly Poroject motivated them to
do?
Next Q's project will be all things Delivery or Logistics. This arose
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> Anyone know why the search facility can't find "Waingatebridge Cottages" ?
Presumably this terrace in the Lake District which has no 'name=';
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314851241
and which is on a street that also has no 'name=':
http://www.op
14 matches
Mail list logo
