On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> Still makes use of 2 fields but keeps the main field 'tidy'.
You can use whatever field name you want for non-standard usage, as
long as it doesn't interfere with prior art---but you will likely find
chosing something unique is not very useful.
(...As nea
On 19 March 2015 at 16:31, Ian Caldwell
wrote:
>
> On 19 March 2015 at 15:54, Pmailkeey . wrote:
>
>> If map renderers don't want to use C and U numbered roads, that is up to
>> them to ignore and not for mappers to place in a different field in the
>> database.
>>
>
> But that means that render
On 19 March 2015 at 15:54, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> If map renderers don't want to use C and U numbered roads, that is up to
> them to ignore and not for mappers to place in a different field in the
> database.
>
But that means that renderers would have to analyse the strings and that
analysis will
Hi Dan,
On 19 March 2015 at 08:15, Dan S wrote:
> 2015-03-19 1:54 GMT+00:00 Pmailkeey . :
> >
> > On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach wrote:
> >>
> >> A wiki search for admin_ref finds
> >>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Tagging_Road_Numbers
> >>
> >>
> >
On 19 March 2015 at 09:39, Andy Allan wrote:
> On 19 March 2015 at 01:39, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> > So all ABCU road numbers need to be consistently placed
>
> No they don't. We've had the discussion many times before, and in the
> UK we don't put C or U refs into the "ref" tag. This is for good
>
On 19 March 2015 at 01:39, Pmailkeey . wrote:
> So all ABCU road numbers need to be consistently placed
No they don't. We've had the discussion many times before, and in the
UK we don't put C or U refs into the "ref" tag. This is for good
reasons, as other people have explained.
> It seems OSM
2015-03-19 1:54 GMT+00:00 Pmailkeey . :
>
> On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach wrote:
>>
>> Dan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Can you point us to some further reading about this "admin_ref"
>>
>> > tag?
>>
>> > The wiki isn't telling me about it. If there is indeed a consensus
>>
>> > then it'd be nice fo
7 matches
Mail list logo