Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 05/06/15 20:40, Lester Caine wrote: On 05/06/15 18:44, SK53 wrote: All of those parts of the former parts of Middlesex within Greater London and outside postal London retained Middlesex as part of the address long after 1965, see wikipedia

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 05/06/15 18:44, SK53 wrote: > All of those parts of the former parts of Middlesex within Greater > London and outside postal London retained Middlesex as part of the > address long after 1965, see wikipedia > . > These days it i

[Talk-GB] Fwd: [Talk-scotland] State of the Map Scotland

-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

All of those parts of the former parts of Middlesex within Greater London and outside postal London retained Middlesex as part of the address long after 1965, see wikipedia . These days it is not clear that the addresses are 'offic

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 05/06/15 15:15, SK53 wrote: > An example from my own experience: failure to differentiate between the > two Hayes in Greater London, cost a Spanish University involvement in a > multi-million Euro project. They arrived 3 hours late for start of > meeting by which time we had identified roles for

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

Depends what administration you are talking about; in government terms perhaps, but Bromley RFC's part of the Kent RFU and Uxbridge of Middlesex. Government admin is not the be all and end all... On 05/06/2015, Colin Smale wrote: > > > The Royal Mail has deprecated the use of counties in address

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 5 June 2015 at 14:31, Colin Smale wrote: > > > > The Royal Mail has deprecated the use of counties in addressing. The PAF > (Postcode Address File) no longer contains counties. > snip.. > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > htt

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

The Royal Mail has deprecated the use of counties in addressing. The PAF (Postcode Address File) no longer contains counties. In any case, I think you are only talking about "postal counties" which are only a fictional concept anyway. Is Bromley in Kent? Is Uxbridge in Middlesex? Only in the p

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 05/06/15 14:15, Wittle, Paul wrote: Hi, Is it ok to add a tag 'addr:county' when drawing properties, it doesn't seem to be an officially recognised tag but I can find some references to it online? Also, would you put sub-districts of a town (i.e. Wyke Regis in Weymouth) under 'addr:plac

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On 05/06/15 14:15, Wittle, Paul wrote: > Is it ok to add a tag 'addr:county' when drawing properties, it doesn't > seem to be an officially recognised tag but I can find some references > to it online? I don't think it's necessary if the postcode has been added. > Also, would you put sub-districts

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

On Fri Jun 5 14:15:09 2015 GMT+0100, Wittle, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Is it ok to add a tag 'addr:county' when drawing properties, it doesn't seem > to be an officially recognised tag but I can find some references to it > online? > > Also, would you put sub-districts of a town (i.e. Wyke Regis in

[Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

Hi, Is it ok to add a tag 'addr:county' when drawing properties, it doesn't seem to be an officially recognised tag but I can find some references to it online? Also, would you put sub-districts of a town (i.e. Wyke Regis in Weymouth) under 'addr:place'? Best Regards, Paul Wittle GIS Develope

Re: [Talk-GB] OS Open Names

I've been looking more closely at the postcodes in the OS Open Names and there seems to be some problems with them. I've had a few comments about missing postcodes and some strange positions of a few too. I'm going to look into this and take it up with OS, but in the meantime I suggest sticking