Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

2015-06-08 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:18 +, Wittle, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > It is interesting that people often say UK counties are defunct because the > post office no longer use them; you could argue that postal addressing was > not really the purpose of counties in the first place. The point of counties

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

2015-06-08 Thread Nick Whitelegg
As an aside... I can kind of understand why people get grumpy about the pre-1971 (?) counties now. While I grew up with the post-1971 counties and are thoroughly used to them, so things like Avon et al never bothered me, while things like Middlesex seem antiquated... I now get grumpy about thes

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

2015-06-08 Thread Chris Hill
On 08/06/15 10:18, Wittle, Paul wrote: Hi, It is interesting that people often say UK counties are defunct because the post office no longer use them; you could argue that postal addressing was not really the purpose of counties in the first place. The point of counties being more about gover

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

2015-06-08 Thread Colin Smale
Some types of county are alive and well, others are pretty much defunct. There are at five types of thing called "county" that I know of in England: 1) Non-metropolitan county 2) Metropolitan county 3) Ceremonial county 4) Postal county 5) Vice County 1) Is a "normal" county, with

Re: [Talk-GB] Quick tagging question

2015-06-08 Thread Wittle, Paul
Hi, It is interesting that people often say UK counties are defunct because the post office no longer use them; you could argue that postal addressing was not really the purpose of counties in the first place. The point of counties being more about governmental practices than delivering post.