On 17/08/2015 23:25, Rob Nickerson wrote:
So far there is little interest to do this on the OSM default render
style which seems odd to me given how much fuss there has been on this
list to recent changes to the footway/path style (over the last year)!
There's no interest to do this in the
On 17/08/2015 21:43, Rob Nickerson wrote:
... In regards to designation=*, are we now the only country that
makes a distinction between paths you have a legal right to walk on
and any other path that might exist because people happen to walk over
the land thus leaving a desire line path?
Hi
Thanks Andy,
Fully aware of access land, undocumented rights of way and permissive
paths. I just need to remember to be careful of what I write on this
mailing list (but I was trying not to write an essay).
I'm surprised if this is just England and Wales as I would have thought
some other
On 8/17/2015 3:25 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote:
I'm surprised if this is just England and Wales as I would have
thought some other country has some way of documenting paths in a
legal context and as such this may be relevant for other countries
I'm not aware of any countries which quite have the
Hi
My thoughts as follows:
This is really going to be something for a UK specific rendering. It is
actually quite useful as a QC exercise to rendering footways/paths with and
without a designation tag. Something I do on my own Garmin map. The
presumption on my part being that ideally we
Hi,
Sorry, bit last minute but Glasgow social meetup is cancelled tomorrow.
But will be meeting again soon. Watch this space for updates
Thanks,
Tim ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Thanks Dudley.
I'm not sure that I agree that this is UK specific. We render roads
according to their status (motorway to unclassified), and as such I see
potential to do this for paths irrespective of country. In regards to
designation=*, are we now the only country that makes a distinction
7 matches
Mail list logo
