Brilliant, thanks.
As per Rob's email of yesterday, should we also add ref:seedcode for Scotland?
Cheers
Stuart
> On 7 Jan 2016, at 23:01, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
>> On 7 January 2016 at 20:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
>>
>> If no-one objects to ref:edubase can someone add it to the wiki? We sh
On 7 January 2016 at 20:48, Brian Prangle wrote:
> If no-one objects to ref:edubase can someone add it to the wiki? We should
> probably also add some other stuff that's come up just in case there are
> folk who are not on this mailing list who want to discover what the
> consensus is in the UK
Hi Rob/Brian,
If someone can let me know what the API call looks like to determine whether it
has a name and I’ll happily add it in :-)
Fwiw the current search looks like this:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/api/4/tag/stats?key=[KEY]&value=[VALUE]
eg
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/api
Not my tool - I just have a version of it running. Adam has provided me an
updated version that I need to look at this weekend. I can see if I can add
such a percentage tracker at the same time. For now you'll just have to
keep looking at the taginfo page:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/
Hi all,
As noted if you include #OSMschools in your changeset comments then they
will appear on the following map:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=OSMschool#6/53.508/-3.571
Pascal Neis has kindly offered to provide ad-hoc data dumps from this. The
first was produced yesterd
If no-one objects to ref:edubase can someone add it to the wiki? We should
probably also add some other stuff that's come up just in case there are
folk who are not on this mailing list who want to discover what the
consensus is in the UK for mapping schools.
Also I'm finding that frequently I'm
H iDudley
If we increase the number of mappers we should autimatically increase the
amount of data. Also if we facilitate the release of OpenData that should
do likewise. Improving the quality of the data : toolsets and cohesion?
Don't want to make this too wordy: I thought about putting in some
Hi Brian
This is looking good.
We don't seem to be covering "development" of the actual database in the
context of increasing the amount of data in it with regard to the UK. i.e.
"improving the UK map". I think it would be good to capture this as an aim but
I'm not sure about how you would
I'm not sure if this will help you, but the UK Wikimedia chapter's objects
are as follows:
- The Objects of the Charity are, for the benefit of the public, to
promote and support the widest possible public access to, use of and
contribution to Open Content of an encyclopaedic or education
On 06/01/2016 14:06, SK53 wrote:
For Food Hygiene (FHRS) data the equivalent internal identifier has
converged on fhrs:id, but this was is in part because a number of
other items of data from the Food Hygiene scheme have also been added
within OSM. So I dont think this establishes any precedent
Many many thanks to Robert for coming up with this tool so quickly: it's
matching might be a bit rough but it's a great help in finding what needs
mapping where
regards
Brian
On 3 January 2016 at 18:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 January 2016 at
My vote would go to a format of ref:. Looking at the wiki for ref, a
great many of the “” there are not things that can be ascertained
from a ground survey, but are internal IDs or reference numbers. What I am
proposing is therefore consistent with the wiki.
I’m not at all hung up on what shou
12 matches
Mail list logo
