Re: [Talk-GB] School mapping - Who's involved

2016-02-01 Thread Dave F
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_turbo/MapCSS http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/e7F Dave F. On 01/02/2016 17:02, Gregory wrote: Cheers Dave, the "sets" feature of Overpass is good to know about. However the set logic isn't what I'm after as such. I want to all schools that have an isc

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 1 February 2016 at 13:02, Tim Waters wrote: > Great stuff. I think a few hundred maps (if not all) from this collection > are already in the wikimaps warper. > However there was an issue with making a mosaic (stitched layer) for the > category, so this will be fixed soon. Once that's done, ho

Re: [Talk-GB] School mapping - Who's involved

2016-02-01 Thread Gregory
Cheers Dave, the "sets" feature of Overpass is good to know about. However the set logic isn't what I'm after as such. I want to all schools that have an isced:level tag to be blue dots, all the schools without an isced:level tag to be red dots. You could display other comparisons, such as schools

Re: [Talk-GB] School mapping - Who's involved

2016-02-01 Thread Dave F
Re 1c) Unsure what two queries you want to compare, but OT does allow difference comparisons by first saving each query result to a variable: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Sets http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Difference Example: http:/

Re: [Talk-GB] School mapping - Who's involved

2016-02-01 Thread Gregory
Hello, 1) I think isced:level is really helpful, as I've known people wanting a list of "all primary schools nearby" for various jobs. Is there a map/list that shows schools with that tag or not? Maybe something like ITO World's maps? 1b) Ah, they have one for name/no-name, might be good to reques

[Talk-GB] School mapping - Who's involved

2016-02-01 Thread Rob Nickerson
All, We've a few of way's of counting how many people are involved with the quarterly project to map schools. As such I have updated the wiki to focus on comments rather than the raw numbers (e.g. which areas are you mapping, how else are you helping). Feel free to update. http://wiki.openstreetm

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Tim Waters
On 1 February 2016 at 12:30, Jez Nicholson wrote: > I've copied my control points over to http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629 > Great stuff. I think a few hundred maps (if not all) from this collection are already in the wikimaps warper. However there was an issue with making a mosaic (stitched l

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Jez Nicholson
I've copied my control points over to http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629 On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 11:51 Grant Slater wrote: > On 31 January 2016 at 20:04, Richard Fairhurst > wrote: > > > > For individual sheets like this, I think Mapwarper (mapwarper.net) is > going > > to be your best bet. It's

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Grant Slater
On 31 January 2016 at 20:04, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > For individual sheets like this, I think Mapwarper (mapwarper.net) is going > to be your best bet. It's not the sort of task that's well suited to the > techcentric skillset of OSM Operations (by which I mean Grant :) ) and I'd > be surpris

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Tim Waters
Hi folks, I'm the developer of mapwarper.net and the wikimaps (wikimedia) warper http://warper.wmflabs.org/ also. The wikimaps warper is part of the Wikimaps project https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimaps lead by Susanna Anas I'll explain some of the differences. Mapwarper.net is d

Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised

2016-02-01 Thread Jez Nicholson
Here's my first go at the Kilamanjaro map http://mapwarper.net/maps/12352#Preview_Map_tab On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 at 20:43 SK53 wrote: > There is/was a mapwarper instance for wikimedia. I don't have the details > to hand, but perhaps Tim Waters will be able to tell us. > > I think the problem with o