On 12/02/16 23:01, John Aldridge wrote:
> You mean they serve the same function as not:name does for street names
> in reducing noise from automated consistency checking? OK, I can see
> that's useful.
>
>> But don't assume that the data
>> provided by the third party are more up to date than the
Hi
I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted
in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two
"unclassified" roads.
Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits at
the top of the loop, although it would make
Hello Dudley,
Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if there's
explicit evidence of it being one, or "suspected=orpa" if there isn't (e.g. a
'green lane' which is unsignposted but has evidence of regular foot/horse use).
Nick
From:
This page gives a bit of background info about these ORPAs on OS maps
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/about/governance/foi/questions/2011/0041.html
--colin
On 2016-02-13 21:10, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Hello Dudley,
>
> Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if
4 matches
Mail list logo