Re: [Talk-GB] Additional Tagging Suggestions for Schools

2016-02-13 Thread Lester Caine
On 12/02/16 23:01, John Aldridge wrote: > You mean they serve the same function as not:name does for street names > in reducing noise from automated consistency checking? OK, I can see > that's useful. > >> But don't assume that the data >> provided by the third party are more up to date than the

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Dudley Ibbett
Hi I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two "unclassified" roads. Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits at the top of the loop, although it would make

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Nick Whitelegg
Hello Dudley, Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if there's explicit evidence of it being one, or "suspected=orpa" if there isn't (e.g. a 'green lane' which is unsignposted but has evidence of regular foot/horse use). Nick From:

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

2016-02-13 Thread Colin Smale
This page gives a bit of background info about these ORPAs on OS maps https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/about/governance/foi/questions/2011/0041.html --colin On 2016-02-13 21:10, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > Hello Dudley, > > Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if