Same details as before for tonight's concall: 0800 2290900 code 33224
On 28 April 2016 at 18:11, SK53 wrote:
> I presume it is the same as previous conference calls. See older mails on
> this list.
>
> Jerry
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 17:16, Dennis Bauszus
The details I have (from previous calls) is...
phone: 0800 229 0900
password: 332249
I started a document for collaborative/live minuting, here:
https://hackpad.com/2016-04-28-OSM-UK-Meeting-1G7GMcJ26O7
My WiFi connection hass been a bit funny lately, so hoping I stay able to
take minutes.
Have the number and password for the conference call this evening
already been passed out?
Dennis
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Is healthcare going to be our Q2 project?
It would be good to get a co-ordination list on a wiki page somewhere.
I've made a request to the North East Ambulance Service. However they're
aware not everyone informs them, so I'll probably contact some other
organisations I know.
They've previously
I can pm a local mapper who is normally pretty responsive.
I rarely get into the city centre these days.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Thu Apr 28 09:51:27 2016 GMT+0100, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Are there any East Midlands mappers in the Leicester area who could update
> the road &
Hi All,
Are there any East Midlands mappers in the Leicester area who could update the
road & buildings in the vicinity of the new Haymarket Bus Station?
Google appears to show the new layout
(https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.6383422,-1.1307455,319m/data=!3m1!1e3) and
certainly has the
Hi Neil,
Thanks, I didn't realise there was such a delay on areas.
Tom
web: http://tomchance.org
twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP
On 28 April 2016 at 08:33, Neil Pilgrim
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> My guess would be
Hi Tom,
My guess would be that since this wad was added very recently, then the
corresponding 'area', which is updated less frequently (only within
overpass) does not generate results for you. You can see this if you
comment out certain parts of your last query:
- the line showing the relation
The Sacred Heart is a good example - using openlayers, set up so that
the "(c) OpenStreetMap contributors" is clearly visible. Seems to me
you're doing it right -
Dan
2016-04-27 19:44 GMT+01:00 Colin Spiller :
> Interesting wiki entry. Very technical - at least for me.
Okay, another one with a problem.
Using the exact same query for this ward relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6173643
Returns an empty dataset:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWi
If I run the equivalent query suggesting by Neil, it downloads some of ways
that are near to the boundary,
Before we started on this there was a survey which 100 people replied to,
with a majority indicating they were in favour of a local chapter, which
does indicate some need.
I do go out mapping regularly too and improve the quality/quantity of the
data - as do most of the people currently working
11 matches
Mail list logo