Hi Neil, Thanks, I didn't realise there was such a delay on areas.
Tom web: http://tomchance.org twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP On 28 April 2016 at 08:33, Neil Pilgrim <osm-talk...@kepier.clara.net> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > My guess would be that since this wad was added very recently, then the > corresponding 'area', which is updated less frequently (only within > overpass) does not generate results for you. You can see this if you > comment out certain parts of your last query: > - the line showing the relation (A) works fine > - the line generating points around the edges of the relation (A) works > fine > - the line generating points within the area (a) derived from the relation > (A) shows no difference, ie. it doesn't work! > > Perhaps keeping trying, or just try waiting a day or so and try again :) > > -- > Neil > > > On 28 April 2016 at 08:08, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: > >> Okay, another one with a problem. >> >> Using the exact same query for this ward relation: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6173643 >> >> Returns an empty dataset: >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWi >> >> If I run the equivalent query suggesting by Neil, it downloads some of >> ways that are near to the boundary, but not all, and not the ways within >> the boundary: >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWj >> >> Any suggestions gratefully received! >> >> Tom >> >> web: http://tomchance.org >> twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP >> >> On 25 April 2016 at 16:45, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Neil, >>> >>> I think I'll just have to go with that solution and then delete the ways >>> I don't want. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> web: http://tomchance.org >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance >>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP >>> >>> On 23 April 2016 at 16:42, Neil Pilgrim <osm-talk...@kepier.clara.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I've had a play with this since I've been working with overpass turbo a >>>> bit recently; the best I've come up with so far is something like this: >>>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPR (waaaay over-commented ;)) >>>> As you'll see, this does include these roads, but does also include >>>> roads leaving the area. >>>> If you un-comment the relation, then that shows the boundary too, which >>>> I found useful for debugging. >>>> This may be able to be simplified/optimised, but I've gone with what >>>> works, and I switched to using a timeout/json as I'm used to that :) >>>> If the ways missing were part of the relation then I think >>>> way(r.A)[highway][name] should select them too, but that's not how the >>>> relation is composed. >>>> >>>> Hope that gives some other ideas, if nothing else :) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Neil >>>> >>>> >>>> On 23 April 2016 at 14:20, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> It has been a very long time since I last posted here! >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the >>>>> bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone >>>>> spot >>>>> the problem in the data? >>>>> >>>>> Here's the example I'm working with: >>>>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPI >>>>> >>>>> The problem is that some roads aren't being downloaded with the query. >>>>> >>>>> If you follow that link and run the query, you'll see that the top >>>>> section of Belvedere Road, and all of Landsdowne Place, are excluded. >>>>> There >>>>> are a few others like this on the edges of the area. >>>>> >>>>> I thought it might be because the way used by the boundary relation >>>>> runs down the same nodes as those roads. But just at the top of those >>>>> roads, the A-Road Church Road is downloaded despite being represented in >>>>> the data in the same way. >>>>> >>>>> I tried putting a 'kink' in the boundary way down at the other end of >>>>> Landsdowne Place where it meets Fox Hill so it 'encompasses' a node, but >>>>> that didn't help. >>>>> >>>>> I hope this all makes sense, and maybe somebody can help? >>>>> >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> web: http://tomchance.org >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance >>>>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-GB mailing list >>>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-GB mailing list >>>> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
