Re: [Talk-GB] OS Locator November 2016

On Monday 06 February 2017 20:27:16 Robert Scott wrote: > Hey all, > > Does anyone have a copy of OS OpenData Locator's November 2015 release still > kicking around anywhere? Ok, I acknowledge I said 2016 in the subject, but 2015 in the body. I mean of course 2015. robert.

[Talk-GB] OS Locator November 2016

Hey all, Does anyone have a copy of OS OpenData Locator's November 2015 release still kicking around anywhere? robert. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath Open Data is not always accurate.

On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 14:53 +, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 06/02/2017 11:18, Colin Smale wrote: > > > > >    > >   On 2017-02-06 09:57, Dave F wrote: > >    > > >  On 05/02/2017 11:33, > > > Colin Smale wrote: > > > > > > > > > >   Any

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath Open Data is not always accurate.

On 06/02/2017 11:18, Colin Smale wrote: On 2017-02-06 09:57, Dave F wrote: On 05/02/2017 11:33, Colin Smale wrote: Any paths that no longer follow the official route (as per the DM/DS) should not be tagged as PROW and probably as access=permissive unless they go across otherwise public

Re: [Talk-GB] Turbo Overpass Help

For anyone else wanting to run this query to help them clean up naptan data, just one small addition: add the qualifier unclassified to the list of roads Regards Brian On 6 February 2017 at 11:53, Roland Olbricht wrote: > Hi > > As part of the cleanup and refresh of NaPTAN

Re: [Talk-GB] Turbo Overpass Help

Roland you are a star! It works a treat. Many many thanks Brian On 6 February 2017 at 11:53, Roland Olbricht wrote: > Hi > > As part of the cleanup and refresh of NaPTAN data in the West Midlands >> we need to identify any bus stope nodes that were added in the old >>

Re: [Talk-GB] Turbo Overpass Help

Hi As part of the cleanup and refresh of NaPTAN data in the West Midlands we need to identify any bus stope nodes that were added in the old manner i.e as a node on the highway rather than as a separate node to the side. Is this possible in turbo overpass? It's defeated me so far! Any help

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath Open Data is not always accurate.

On 2017-02-06 09:57, Dave F wrote: > On 05/02/2017 11:33, Colin Smale wrote: > >> Any paths that no longer follow the official route (as per the DM/DS) should >> not be tagged as PROW and probably as access=permissive unless they go >> across otherwise public land. The official route is still

[Talk-GB] Turbo Overpass Help

Hi everyone As part of the cleanup and refresh of NaPTAN data in the West Midlands we need to identify any bus stope nodes that were added in the old manner i.e as a node on the highway rather than as a separate node to the side. Is this possible in turbo overpass? It's defeated me so far!

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath Open Data is not always accurate.

On 05/02/2017 11:33, Colin Smale wrote: Any paths that no longer follow the official route (as per the DM/DS) should not be tagged as PROW and probably as access=permissive unless they go across otherwise public land. The official route is still a public right of way, it's just no longer

Re: [Talk-GB] Propose automated edit to update NAPTAN data in the west mids

Hi Matthijs I echo Stuart - it's best to deal with these with the local NaPTAN maintainer, who works in TfWM Regards Stuart On 5 February 2017 at 21:22, Stuart Reynolds < stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk> wrote: > Hi Matthijs, > > Wherever possible the names in NaPTAN should match what is on