On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 03:07:38PM -0700, Dyserth wrote:
>
> With regards to deleting the areas mapped by Sam888 all over Wales I frankly
> did not want to block out or delete these areas as I felt it would have
> meant modifying the map data too extensively, been very time consuming, and
This is
On 13/02/2017 18:19, Marco Boeringa wrote:
But I will leave this to all you now to decide.
Just for info, I'm currently going backwards through the relevant
changesets by the same user* in north Notts in areas that I'm (very)
familiar with and am fixing or removing "obviously wrong landuse"
Marco thanks for all your efforts on this issue.
I've continued to edit and comment dubious landuses (and reverse some
cliffs to get left on the top) based on my knowledge of the hills in
Snowdonia.and confirmation from bing. In my opinion, there's definitely a
need for a community project over a
Hi all,
Since there was no more real discussion, I have decided to also revert
the other two changesets. This means all the heath should re-appear on
the map as it used to be before, except for the single edit by Brian
based on his local knowledge of Snowdonia.
I think the suggestion by one
I've had a play around because I noticed that someone has added lots of
redundant administrative boundaries in Dublin complete with slightly
dubious names eg. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6114262 . Trying
searches it seems that Nominatim is sensible enough to not include the
boundary=hist
Hi Paul,
Thanks, that's a good point. I wasn't planning on adding subdivisions such
as the Ridings (it opens the floodgates for the Sussex Rapes and the
Hundreds of other counties and I'm not sure how relevant they are to people
in the modern day). So, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, Yorkshire wouldn'
> Any thoughts?
If there is a way of tagging these so they're ignored by Nominatim etc so
address/location searches only show up modern counties, unless specifically
searched for, and no occlusion occurs, then yes. Otherwise, you might get
the following results:
Sheffield
South Yorkshire
West Rid
Thinking about points raised by a couple of respondents. Firstly, the
thorny issue of whether to record features which no longer exist;
secondly, whether it is actually possible to give precise boundaries to
historic/traditional counties and, thirdly, the source(s) which could be
used for informati
Welcome to Talk-GB Dyserth. Please stick around and use this experience to
help change things so that we can fix this systemic problem with OSM.
OSM UK has just been formed, so now is the time for change.
Regards,
Jez
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:37 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
9 matches
Mail list logo
