Re: [Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

On 19/05/17 19:48, Remek Zajac wrote: So what is your take on "cycleway:right=lane" used on a one-way street David? I would say opposite_lane was wrong. I would interpret as saying that cycleway:right=lane was correct.

Re: [Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

Hi, I'd go with your option 1. The cycleway:right=opposite_lane tag is incorrect as the lane is not contraflow "*It should then be assumed that cycle traffic is allowed to flow in the customary direction for traffic on that side of the road"* And on a oneway street without a contraflow both

Re: [Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM, David Woolley wrote: > > Google maps is copyright, so can't be used as the basis of another map. > Moreover there is an explicit restriction on the use of Google Street View > to create maps. So far i've only used Street View to

Re: [Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

On 19/05/17 18:47, Remek Zajac wrote: Not sure I understand what the problem with googlemaps is, but yes, it's like you've just described. Google maps is copyright, so can't be used as the basis of another map. Moreover there is an explicit restriction on the use of Google Street View to

Re: [Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

David Woolley wrote: > Can you please describe the situation without reference to Google Maps (to which I have not referred). > Are you saying that the road is one way, with a cycle lane on the right, in the same direction as for motor vehicles? Not sure I understand what the problem with

[Talk-gb-london] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

Dear Mappers., Writing to you to consult on the bicycle lane tagging - to work out if it's a tagging error or my misinterpretation of the rules . I am working on my bicycle journey planner (http://zikes.website) and last week i used it to guide me

[Talk-GB] cryptic bicycle tagging/attribution on Lever Street in London

Dear Mappers., Writing to you to consult on the bicycle lane tagging - to work out if it's a tagging error or my misinterpretation of the rules . I am working on my bicycle journey planner (http://zikes.website) and last week i used it to guide me

[Talk-GB] Mapping the Historic Boundaries of Wales: Commotes and Cantrefs

[cross-posted] FYI: https://rcahmw.gov.uk/mapping-the-historic-boundaries-of-wales-commotes-and-cantrefs/ "The Royal Commission [on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales] has developed two digital geospatial layers using late-medieval sources and historic parish boundaries to recreate

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 12:22 +0100, SK53 wrote: > Seems my earlier email was a timely reminder, We seem to be down to > over 4,500 now. I know I can't have done more than a couple of > thousand of these. I have certainly seen evidence that these are simply being armchaired with no particular

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

On 19/05/2017 12:22, SK53 wrote: We still have a very large number of place=farm, but I suspect these are much harder to resolve as many will be former farms which are now residential. Many, perhaps the bulk, of these have been added from OS OpenStreetView data. place=farm will be harder

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #356 2017-05-09-2017-05-15

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 356, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9068/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-GB] Landuse Farm

Seems my earlier email was a timely reminder, We seem to be down to over 4,500 now. I know I can't have done more than a couple of thousand of these. We still have a very large number of place=farm, but I suspect these are much harder to