I still do this on an ad hoc basis, but have never automated the process.
For those who might be interested here's what I currently do:
1. Download a pbf file from Geofabrik (usually gb but could be smaller area)
2. Convert it to .o5m format with osmconvert
3. Run a filter to find only highways wi
I agree with SK53 that identifying missing RoW is the primary importance.
Robert: Is your code open / available anywhere such that one can help improve
it / take inspiration from / run it locally ?
I would like to use something better than flipping on/off a display of the ways
in a Hampshire K
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:57 PM, SK53 wrote:
> A single tag of the form flickr:id= would work to provide a single
> reference photo. People have at various times tried to identify with tags
> the photos which they used as part of surveys to edit a particular element.
> Probably most used these da
In the dim & distant past you could do the exact opposite: place osm
identifiers on Flickr: here's a photo of mine with such tags
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/4032609321/.
Unfortunately I dont believe Flickr supports this at all any more. However,
resolving the flickr tags to OSM element
Hi
No, the "main" OSM database has no way to store images. But there are
third-party projects that integrate with OSM, and your group can use
those!
Mapillary: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary
OpenStreetCam: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetCam
They have JOSM plugins too
Hi,
I am helping a community group make a survey of a small wood area. This will be
tagging trees, badger habitats, and even sewers.
They use a Garmin GPS with a camera to take pictures and then we use JOSM to
extract the location to later add information like species and such and we
upload it
On 27 June 2017 at 11:56, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> However it reports much lower mapping coverage than I expected. It
> appears to be due to a mismatch of prow_ref format. I know that at least
> in and around Oxford, most paths have been mapped with a prow_ref based
> on the definitive statement in
I have some figures from last year for the counties in the N. Midlands:
Highway Authority ProW No. Prow Len (km) OSM Prow Len (km) OSM Highway Len
(km) Pct designation Pct total
Derbyshire 16185 5202.9 2927.4 1374.4 56.26 82.68
Leicestershire 6149 2603.0 718.0 1089.1 27.58 69.42
Lincolnshire 8000
On 27 June 2017 at 13:30, SK53 wrote:
> It appears that the tool only accepts as mapped rights of way mapped with
> some local identifier, rather than those with a designation tag. Hampshire
> is one of the better mapped places in England and Wales. have no problem
> with us eventually adding ide
This format is quite common. It can be transformed into the other form
(I've done this for one of the Sussexes, and, I suspect, Oxon), but I think
if we are using prow_refs for anything at all it is to communicate with the
relevant Highway Authority, so we should use what they use (and in
particula
Quick response.
It appears that the tool only accepts as mapped rights of way mapped with
some local identifier, rather than those with a designation tag. Hampshire
is one of the better mapped places in England and Wales. have no problem
with us eventually adding identifiers for PRoW, but surely
Hi Robert,
Thanks a lot for adding Oxfordshire to your comparison tool!
However it reports much lower mapping coverage than I expected. It
appears to be due to a mismatch of prow_ref format. I know that at least
in and around Oxford, most paths have been mapped with a prow_ref based
on the defini
Some of you have have already come across my Public Rights of Way
comparison tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/ which
aims to help mappers trying to complete the mapping of Rights of Way
in their area.
I've recently added data for two additional counties: Oxfordshire and
Hampshir
13 matches
Mail list logo