Re: [Talk-GB] Mistagging of old telephone boxes

On 22/12/17 22:32, Dave F wrote: To double check -  CC BY-SA 2.0 is compatible with OSM? The problem is going to be the BY part. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Asda petrol station data

Hi all, Following the shell petrol station data I wanted to learn more about the tools that Ilya was using (the conflate script and the community validation website). To do this I have downloaded the Asda petrol station data. This was listed on the OSM United Kingdom wiki page as a source we have

Re: [Talk-GB] Mistagging of old telephone boxes

Just looked at one in my city: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5565173 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5283204876/history This is one he tagged as a usable phone. He added the note after I queried his edits. So it looks like he didn't use Geograph. To double check - CC BY-SA 2.0 is

[Talk-GB] Mistagging of old telephone boxes

Hi FYI user Yorvik Prestigitator has been tagging telephone boxes across Britain. He assumed some of these are working phones & tagged them as such, when they're purely ornamental (the ones in my city are recent additions & have flowers growing out of them at the moment). When asked for his

[Talk-GB] NaPTAN merge tool?

Hi all, Who’s maintaining the NaPTAN merge tool? It seems to be broken — every request to the node layer gives a HTTP error 403. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN _and_OSM_data#Tools http://b3e.net/novam/ Thanks, Philip signature.asc Description: This is