Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

previous_name isn't documented -- and seems a bad idea. It's unlikely to be searchable with Nominatim, and won't be rendered. This is the scheme some of us are using in Bristol https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Bristol#Lifecycle. In an ideal world (!) I'd say use something

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

Is there a tag being used to add these to OSM? On 08/05/2018 13:14, David Woolley wrote: On 08/05/18 13:10, Dave F wrote: I've changed over to using disused:shop=* as it keeps the use of the shop in the tag. Due to shop classifications they often reopen with businesses of a similar nature.

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 08/05/18 13:10, Dave F wrote: I've changed over to using disused:shop=* as it keeps the use of the shop in the tag. Due to shop classifications they often reopen with businesses of a similar nature. (food, clothes etc) That reflects the planning classification (which are actually more fine

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 07/05/2018 20:27, Brian Prangle wrote: The answer to the question I posed originally seems to be either  "never" or "immediately". Maplin I understand waiting some more time for the liquidation process to complete. For clarity the mechanical edit would be shop=vacant and previous_name=

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

And some with an apostrophe: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=Lloyd+TSB#values -- Andrew From: Rob Nickerson Sent: 08 May 2018 00:19:36 To: Brian Prangle Cc: Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us >Lloyds and TSB banks