On 4 August 2018 04:03:13 CEST, "webmas...@killyfole.org.uk"
wrote:
>I don't understand the logic of doing this?
>
>Surely we map for what is there on the ground, not how it renders? If
>a road
>has a reference number or a name, surely it is up to the render if it
>should
>show that informat
I don't understand the logic of doing this?
Surely we map for what is there on the ground, not how it renders? If a road
has a reference number or a name, surely it is up to the render if it should
show that information or not, not how we tag it in the database?
In my particular area I have pe
Hi
After many discussions over the years about the referencing of 'C' class
roads there appeared to be a general consensus to keep them in the
database but provide a unique tag to allow them not to be rendered.
This is a list of the discussions (there maybe others):
https://lists.openstreetma
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 419,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10557/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
The 6th UK Open Data Camp is being held in Aberdeen on Saturday 3
November. If you attend, you will meet other OSM UKers, hear about
government open data like LIDAR and the Environment Agency, discuss the
pros and cons of open data, etc.
It is an unconference all about open data, 'unconference' m
5 matches
Mail list logo