Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread jc...@mail.com
On 30/01/2019 15:08, Gregory Marler wrote: > In a lot of cases the towns nicely relate to parish wards (admin_level=10). I understood admin_level=10 was for whole parishes, not parish wards. Surely parish wards should be boundary=political just like district and county electoral

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

2019-01-30 Thread Will Phillips
Hi Andrzej, I feel a bit conflicted here. Having the choice of several tags does make things easier when adding complicated addresses, but for less experienced mappers it does also help if things are kept simple. For example, if better guidance regarding UK address mapping was added to the

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

2019-01-30 Thread Andrzej
Thank you for the discussion so far. I've been thinking about a solution for tagging localities that would work for both mappers who want to tag locality types and those who don't. Current proposals (addr:town|village and addr:locality|sublocality) are two distinct and incompatible tagging

Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread Mark Goodge
On 30/01/2019 16:00, Tom Hughes wrote: The fundamental problem with this, as Jerry has just said, is that many towns in the UK have no defined boundary. Even where there is an administrative entity there is no guarantee that it's boundary equates to what most people would view as the

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging post towns and other addressing issues in the UK

2019-01-30 Thread talk-gb
Hi, There are some interesting views on this topic. Looking at Roberts ideas in the link at the start of the thread, it’s not perfect but makes sense. At the moment we seem to be just putting in the bare minimum as an address, it might be enough to get things delivered to somewhere

Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread Colin Smale
I also have a couple of observations about these changes. 1) Sometimes an admin_centre is being added to a boundary=political (e.g. parliamentary constituencies, electoral wards). I am not sure this is appropriate. 2) There are multiple definitions of "town", and I don't know which definition

Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread Will Phillips
I've already raised concerns I have in a changeset comment about these edits adding admin_level=10 administrative boundary relations for voids between civil parishes. They are tagged with designation=non-civil_parish. This has been discussed on this list previously. My main objection is that

Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread Tom Hughes
On 30/01/2019 15:08, Gregory Marler wrote: A small amount of my time has been funded by Open Cage Data to check towns in the UK. Ideally it should be possible to get a town as both a node and a relation. The fundamental problem with this, as Jerry has just said, is that many towns in the UK

Re: [Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread SK53
A few points: * I believe you should complete the relevant organised edit page on the wiki. * I think any use of admin_level=11 or indeed any use of admin_level at all for un-parished areas needed to be discussed up front. Places

[Talk-GB] Checking UK Towns

2019-01-30 Thread Gregory Marler
You might spot my recent map edits with a changeset such as... "*Checking data and relations for towns in Lincolnshire. This changeset forms part of paid work to improve OpenStreetMap data. #UKTownCheck #OrganisedEditing*" A small amount of my time has been funded by Open Cage Data to check towns