Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

We can check for properties where the brand:wikidata tag was left behind by checking the other tags, particularly name= and shop=. -- Andrew From: SK53 Sent: 28 September 2019 17:32 To: Silent Spike Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook sh

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

The specific problem with that suggestion is that you miss lots of Thomas Cook shops (particularly old Co-op Travel & Ilkeston Co-op travel): it hits about 3 within 15 miles of Nottingham whereas there are nearer 11 (for obvious reasons), and one of those is apparently is not

Re: [Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

It's unclear to me if there's a consensus on the tagging here. Personally I like the `disused:` prefix. I couldn't see if it was mentioned anywhere, but we can also query for all the locations explicitly marked as part of the Thomas Cook brand using the `brand:wikidata` tag: https://overpass-turbo

Re: [Talk-GB] Next quarters project will be fixmes and notes

OSMand also shows them. Phil (trigpoint) On Tuesday, 24 September 2019, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 24/09/2019 13:24, Michael Booth wrote: > > Fixmes can only be viewed in iD or with a QA tool, while notes can be > > viewed on osm.org and StreetComplete which is useful for actually > > going out