On 17/04/2020 15:15, Brian Prangle wrote:
Rather than mappers up and down the country with varying evels of Excel
skills spending many dozens of hours cleaning up this csv could somebody
be kind enough to publish somewhere a cleaned up copy? It would be a
great resource for the QP.
OK,
Hi Andy
I think maybe a bit premature to make the change you've suggested. OK to
convert parcels of land to landuse-=construction as and when HS2 activity
gets going - even if its only demolition.
Regards
Brian
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Andy Robinson wrote:
> Tony, thus far all the
Rather than mappers up and down the country with varying evels of Excel
skills spending many dozens of hours cleaning up this csv could somebody be
kind enough to publish somewhere a cleaned up copy? It would be a great
resource for the QP.
Regards
Brian
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 16:00, Peter
Tony, thus far all the construction activity has been and is enabling works.
That is mostly related to relocating utilities (especially the major ones),
site clearances and the establishment of the working compounds. Many of these
have already in full or in part been mapped into OSM. As yet
+1 for changing Phase One to rail=construction although not, like my
earlier typo, rails=construction ;)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:03 AM Tony OSM wrote:
> we've seen news reports of parts of the alignment fenced off and invaded
> by protestors - those parts are certainly under
we've seen news reports of parts of the alignment fenced off and invaded
by protestors - those parts are certainly under construction, and the
pictures show that bulldozers have been active. I think if we can
identify those areas then construction is now correct.
Tony Shield
TonyS999
On
Jez, I think the actual rails may be a long way off but I agree it’s an
opportunity to stay ahead of the completion.
A question for the whole list. How do folks feel about changing the Phase 1
route from rail=proposed to rail=construction. Perhaps it’s a bit premature but
then perhaps not.
7 matches
Mail list logo
