2014-08-11 1:31 GMT+03:00 SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
Taking for example Nottingham:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24913081
What is the source of this data?
Common knowledge.
How can someone who's local to Nottingham actually verify that the name
that you've added is
Wikipedia Multilingual Map is available on http://mlm.jochentopf.com/
It works really good.
2014-08-06 10:54 GMT+03:00 David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
Unfortunately, the only realisation of this concept that I have found
(not necessarily part of that project) is in an update
Lester,
I don't agree that ukrainian or other-language place names is secondary
information.
We should not extract this information to external data source.
Why don't you say Let's remove population-tag. Values are changing, let's
integrate OSM with some service like
Lester, you are right. I miss understood you previous message.
Do you want OSM data model to be changed?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:RailsPortModels.png
It has very valuable feature: it is flexible for data of absolutely any
kind.
Extracting names to separate table will make it less
Not, it is not a job for external services. It is much better to use single
service(OSM) rather than multiple(OSM+Wikidata).
OpenStreetMap supports multiple names - let's use it. If you don't like
someone use some tags - just ignore those tags.
2014-08-04 20:24 GMT+03:00 Andy Mabbett
Andy, I agree that Berlin doesn't need hundreds of name:**, but not because
they are similar. Just because 80% will never be used. name:** should be
entered by native speakers, not imported by Kolossos. Bury St Edmunds needs
[name:uk=Бері-Сент-Едмендс]. Just assume Ukrainian person reading
It seems that the only place not allowed for adding name:** is UK. That's
why I started this discussion here. Should we discuss it internationaly?
2014-08-05 2:37 GMT+03:00 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
On 05/08/14 00:11, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Andrew Hain wrote:
It was only put in
for them.
2014-08-04 21:25 GMT+03:00 SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
On 04/08/2014 16:15, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Hi! I would like to add ukrainian names for cities of UK, but found that
SomeoneElse_Revert removed some of name:uk-tags in changeset 20757217 with
a comment reverting
10:29 GMT+03:00 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
On 8/5/2014 12:06 AM, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
It seems that the only place not allowed for adding name:** is UK. That's
why I started this discussion here. Should we discuss it internationaly?
There is a general understanding that name:xx
I assert that it is much better to use a single service, because it is
easier to add 100 osm-tags than implement communication with external data
sources.
Nominatim use osm-data, it should not(and I hope will never) use any other
data from Wikidata or other projects.
Mapnik allows to process .osm
Why do you call it poor transliteration?
Actually Бері-Сент-Едмендс is the result of transcription(ˈbɛrɪ sənt
ˈɛdməndz) conversion, additionally united by hyphens according to general
city spelling.
This city name *is used* in ukrainian texts in wikipedia, airline tickets
web-sites, as tourist
Hi! I would like to add ukrainian names for cities of UK, but found that
SomeoneElse_Revert removed some of name:uk-tags in changeset 20757217 with
a comment reverting undiscussed Ukrainian translations including ones
for which there's nothing on the ground.
This is the list of cities I plan to
12 matches
Mail list logo
