On 07/12/2020 17:23, Mark Goodge wrote:
This may be a dim question, and this may possibly be the wrong place to
ask it. But, at the risk of being both dim and out of place... Why does
Nominatim return "Britanniarum Regnum" as the country name for objects
in the UK? For example:
So that can't possibly be when the copyright expires, rather it's
a question of contractual provisions in a license agreement between
them and NLS not copyright as such.
Of course it's only claiming they do have a copyright that they
can make such a license necessary.
Tom
On 01/12/2020 09:49,
If we assume that a new copyright is created by the scanning (which is
a complicated question) then there is no way it expires next year.
What exactly do you think the term is for this copyright and when do
you think it starts from?
I don't think it's relevant anyway as I thought NLS had given
On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
They are intended to stop this type of routing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049
Which is techincally not illegal and in real world usage is not going to
happen.
But unless the
On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:
There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either
no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to
prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit
signed restrictions. I suspect this is
Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config/locales/en-GB.yml#L621
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:00, Paul Berry wrote:
Sorry, I wasn't in edit mode so nothing to do
If you think Bristol or Aberdeen are mad then try Norwich:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/172506
Again presumably due to Norwich's history as a port and therefore
having control of the river.
Tom
On 12/09/2020 22:53, Russ Garrett wrote:
Yeah, I assume what happened is that the City
I suspect that the real clue is in the changeset tags:
resolved:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags=10
So the iD validator has presumably claimed that the tagging of
those paths was "out of date" in some way and this was likely a
misguided attempt to fix that.
Of course that was likely based on
On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB
:
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this mailing
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this mailing list.
Likewise we probably need to think about the criteria of what makes a
good list
11 matches
Mail list logo
