I was thinking about overlaying the HCC KML over OSM in Marble (
http://marble.kde.org ), but I guess both achieve the same thing.
Although I would caution that I have in the last couple of days noticed
that the HCC KML is more out of date than HCC's new online map overlay -
I originally though
Now that seem quite logical to me, thanks for the suggestion.
Regards
Robert
Kevin Peat wrote:
>
>
>I have mapped many of these green lanes in Devon and tagged them as:
>
> highway=track
> designation=unclassified_highway
>
>They were discussed in the past on the list. You sometimes see the
Really what I meant was where the is a RoW (as evidenced by the
definitive map) but the actual line that is used has moved over time,
perhaps to avoid a fallen tree or an area that has become wet and boggy
over the years or otherwise more difficult to traverse than the new line.
Therefore what
This was one of the other things I was wondering about.
If we are mapping what is actually on the ground (which would seem to be
the sensible approach) and then assigning the relevant legal status to
the feature i.e. a footpath/ bridleway etc. in this case and the legal
line RoW is diffident t
;t check to see if the OS stuff has been appended
to it.
Shame this isn't Wikipedia as I think we would have a reasonable
argument for utilising US copyright laws with respect to phone books etc.
Regards
On 03/12/13 11:17, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 3 December 2013 02:51, winto
reating the relevant 'ways' where they do not already exist in OSM,
unless there is a simple way to just import the data?
Regards,
wintonian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
6 matches
Mail list logo
