Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-03-01 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Andrew M. Bishop wrote: Sent: 28 February 2010 5:11 PM To: Brian Prangle Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map? Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com writes: Can't seem to find Birmingham in your drop down list of bondaries! The list of boundaries

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-03-01 Thread Graham Jones
Gregory, I will give you a hand one weekend sometime if you want to have a go at Darlington. There is another prilific mapper working on Teesside at the moment (JoeE I think), who may be willing to help if we contact him. Graham On Mar 1, 2010 1:14 PM, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-28 Thread Brian Prangle
Can't seem to find Birmingham in your drop down list of bondaries! regards Brian ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-28 Thread Andrew M. Bishop
Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com writes: Andrew M. Bishop wrote: One thing that might be useful for this in the UK is my recently updated web page: http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/osm-boundaries/ I'm going to find this useful, thanks. One thing I think might improve it is to put the

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-28 Thread Andrew M. Bishop
Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com writes: Can't seem to find Birmingham in your drop down list of bondaries! The list of boundaries is all of the ones that I could find in the OSM planet dump for the UK. There is a relation called City of Birmingham, I don't know if this is the one that

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-27 Thread Andrew M. Bishop
Steve Doerr steve.do...@blueyonder.co.uk writes: On 23/02/2010 20:51, Ed Loach wrote: Can I just add that it is also best to document the relation numbers of boundaries somewhere fairly obvious on the wiki, to try and prevent duplicate relations appearing for the same boundary. So for

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-27 Thread Dave F.
Andrew M. Bishop wrote: One thing that might be useful for this in the UK is my recently updated web page: http://www.gedanken.org.uk/mapping/osm-boundaries/ I'm going to find this useful, thanks. One thing I think might improve it is to put the Add/Remove higher up the list so that it's

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-25 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Peter Childs wrote: Sent: 25 February 2010 7:53 AM To: peter.r...@aligre.co.uk Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map? snip Thinking about this probably the best way to collect this data is to map who has there rubbish collected on which day

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-25 Thread Peter Miller
On 24 Feb 2010, at 01:16, Peter Reed wrote: Steve, It needn't be parishes. For population data it looks as though I can get down to ward level with up-to-date numbers from ONS. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=13893 Looking at the ONS lists there are about 9,000

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-24 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Peter Reed Sent: 24 February 2010 1:17 AM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map? Steve, It needn't be parishes. For population data it looks as though I can get down to ward level with up-to-date numbers from ONS. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-24 Thread Peter Childs
On 25 February 2010 03:30, Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org wrote: On 24 February 2010 01:16, Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote: Steve, It needn't be parishes. For population data it looks as though I can get down to ward level with up-to-date numbers from ONS.

[Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Peter Reed
As the weather improves we are all going to be out and about tracing roads for OSM. So there are various discussions, and work under way to help find, prioritise and then fill the most important gaps in the map. Larger towns and bigger areas that need attention are fairly well known, but

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Steve Doerr
On 23/02/2010 14:18, Peter Reed wrote: We start with a list of about 1,600 UK settlements, and a figure for the population that lives there. Baring a few errors and omissions, the settlements are the same ones that Cyclestreets uses for local areas - http://www.cyclestreets.net/area/ We

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Steve Doerr wrote: Sent: 23 February 2010 2:43 PM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map? On 23/02/2010 14:18, Peter Reed wrote: We start with a list of about 1,600 UK settlements, and a figure for the population that lives there. Baring a few errors

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Steve Doerr
On 23/02/2010 15:02, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: Steve Doerr wrote: OK. How can we help in supplying better boundary information? For instance, in the Medway Towns (Kent): Strood, Rochester, Chatham, and Gillingham are overlapping horribly. It should be possible to map the

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Steve Doerr wrote: Sent: 23 February 2010 3:45 PM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map? On 23/02/2010 15:02, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: Steve Doerr wrote: OK. How can we help in supplying better boundary information? For instance

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Peter Reed
Thanks for the interest. I haven't tried to collect parish boundaries yet, but it's an obvious step forward. The first thing is to say that I wouldn't want a load of effort going into supporting measuring stuff that is better spent mapping real stuff. So I wouldn't want to encourage

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Steve Doerr
On 23/02/2010 20:51, Ed Loach wrote: Can I just add that it is also best to document the relation numbers of boundaries somewhere fairly obvious on the wiki, to try and prevent duplicate relations appearing for the same boundary. So for example, all the Essex districts have their relations

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Steve Doerr
On 23/02/2010 16:23, Peter Reed wrote: I haven't tried to collect parish boundaries yet, but it's an obvious step forward. I'm not sure I'm necessarily thinking rigidly in terms of parishes. What we're actually trying to replicate is the area for which your population statistics are

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Steve Doerr
On 23/02/2010 23:15, Ed Loach wrote: If they were correctly tagged then: http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/relation[boundary=administ rative][bbox=-74.8,17.4,-68.18,20.31] would get all the relations tagged boundary=administrative in the quoted bbox (Hispaniola, which gets

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Peter Miller
On 23 Feb 2010, at 21:25, Steve Doerr wrote: On 23/02/2010 20:51, Ed Loach wrote: Can I just add that it is also best to document the relation numbers of boundaries somewhere fairly obvious on the wiki, to try and prevent duplicate relations appearing for the same boundary. So for example,

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Thread Peter Reed
Steve, It needn't be parishes. For population data it looks as though I can get down to ward level with up-to-date numbers from ONS. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=13893 Looking at the ONS lists there are about 9,000 wards in England (and about 10,000 parishes). It's