I've recently noticed a lot of "historic" edits in Bath by user SNLA
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SNLA).
There's been some discussion on the changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49401905
What's the prevailing thought process on mapping mostly obliterated
historic buildings - a
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Neil Matthews wrote:
> I've recently noticed a lot of "historic" edits in Bath by user SNLA
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SNLA).
>
> There's been some discussion on the changeset
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49401905
>
> What's the prevailing thought pro
On 15/06/2017 11:24, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Neil Matthews wrote:
...
Maybe other large historic towns have good solutions; Londinium, Eboracum?
I've always understood that OpenStreetMap maps what is *currently*
there. Visible, and verifyable.
That's pretty much the case in
From a quick check it appears she's also added them to OpenHistoricalMap
http://www.openhistoricalmap.org/user/Syvanne%20Aloni/history#map=10/51.5232/-2.1934&layers=H
I'll wait a day or so, to see if she adds any more, then I'll revert her
changesets from OSM.
DaveF
On 15/06/2017 11:52, Andy
4 matches
Mail list logo