Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread David Woolley
Of course, that was one of my concerns. We really need some sort of lifetime tagging with an end-date. You can use opening hours to indicate a period in which something is closed. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread ael via Talk-GB
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Neil Matthews wrote: > Add a note on the main OSM site - maybe with expected finish date of > road works -- might help as a reminder. Oh yes. I ought to do that. I seldom generate notes, so I forget about them. ael

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread ael via Talk-GB
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:38:25PM +0100, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > There is also the temporary affix: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)#Example_4:_Temporary_highway_bridge Oh. I missed that. It would be perfect. Except, as

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread ael via Talk-GB
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > It is closed for repairs, so maybe highway=construction construction=primary > would be better? I thought about that. But changing from primary seemed more problematical if it was forgotten. > It seems that it will be

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Apr 4, 2019, 12:30 PM by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > Of course, that was one of my concerns. We really need some sort of > lifetime tagging with an end-date. > There is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date that allows to

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-04 Thread ael via Talk-GB
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:59:12PM -0400, Devonshire wrote: > Saw this on the local news last night. A 30+ mile diversion is going to cause > a few problems over Easter if they can't get it sorted. I am not that close > but have mapped this area a bit in the past. Personally. I like the

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-03 Thread Neil Matthews
Add a note on the main OSM site - maybe with expected finish date of road works -- might help as a reminder. Cheers, Neil On 03/04/2019 20:38, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > There is also the temporary affix: > >

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-03 Thread Edward Catmur via Talk-GB
There is also the temporary affix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)#Example_4:_Temporary_highway_bridge I'm not entirely sure how well supported that is by routers etc though. On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 20:33 Mateusz Konieczny, wrote: > > It

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-03 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
It is closed for repairs, so maybe highway=construction construction=primary would be better? It seems that it will be more likely to be caught if forgotten, really old highway=construction is far more suspicious that old access=no. Old highway=construction would be caught for example by

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-03 Thread Devonshire
Saw this on the local news last night. A 30+ mile diversion is going to cause a few problems over Easter if they can't get it sorted. I am not that close but have mapped this area a bit in the past. No real view either way on adding the restriction to OSM. Good for users who keep their data

[Talk-GB] New Bridge Gunnislake

2019-04-03 Thread ael via Talk-GB
With some hesitation, I have just added access = no to New Bridge in Gunnislake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608610775 This is one of only two major routes across the lower Tamar, so it is of major importance for routing applications. The bridge has been closed after an accident damaged