Robert,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:57:13 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
...
OSM takes a conservative line on copyright and licensing issues...
I agree with Rob 100% on this, it is pretty obvious that the Government
intends for this data to be freely usable
On 30 July 2013 10:49, o...@k3v.eu wrote:
I agree with Rob 100% on this, it is pretty obvious that the Government
intends for this data to be freely usable by businesses and projects
like OSM. This has been covered to death a number of times in the past.
There is a lot of external data in
On 30/07/2013 11:49, o...@k3v.eu wrote:
Robert,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:57:13 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
...
OSM takes a conservative line on copyright and licensing issues...
I agree with Rob 100% on this, it is pretty obvious that the
And it has been suggested I give a succinct summary of my own verbosity:
LWG view on use of data in OSM under OS OpenData License:
Yes: OS OpenData product except CodePoint
No: CodePoint (a Royal Mail response to Chris Hill needs further
investigation)
You need to formally ask: Any other
Robert W said:
That being the case, please note that Ordnance Survey have recently stated
that their OS OpenData licence is not forward compatible with the ODC-By
and ODbL.
Yes, they did, and that quote has gotten them in a lot of trouble. The Open
Government License (of which Ordnance Survey's
5 matches
Mail list logo
