On 14/02/2016 18:34, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
Routes marked by OS as "Other Route with Public Access" will most
probably be routes that appear on the local Highway Authority's "List
of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense", but are not maintained
to a standard for regular motor
will confirm the actual access for this particular highway.
Kind Regards
Dudley
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 18:34:29 +
> From: robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com
> To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access
>
> On 13 February 2016 at 14
On 13 February 2016 at 14:57, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
> I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign
> posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two
> "unclassified" roads.
> Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that s
>
> FROM: Dudley Ibbett
> SENT: 13 February 2016 14:57
> TO: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> SUBJECT: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access
>
> Hi
>
> I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign
> posted in both directions as a "
Nick
From: Dudley Ibbett
Sent: 13 February 2016 14:57
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access
Hi
I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted
in both directions as a &
Hi
I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted
in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two
"unclassified" roads.
Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits at
the top of the loop, although it would make qu
>What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular
>path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source
.>that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are
>subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not
have been u
On 24/03/11 09:10, Mike Harris wrote:
> PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and
> important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a "public right of
> way" (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway
> open to all traffic') but nevertheless
PLEASE do not remove the ORPA designations - they are meaningful and
important (in the UK). An ORPA is a way that is not a "public right of
way" (i.e. public footpath, public bridleway, restricted byway or 'byway
open to all traffic') but nevertheless has legal rights for at least
pedestrian us
9 matches
Mail list logo
