Well as I said, some of the points were covered.
The difference in scale is appreciated, although there is obvious scope for
mappers to enrich open tree data significantly. There other major
difference is one will typically about conflation and the other about
importing (leaving aside planned upda
On 15 May 2017 at 12:38, SK53 wrote:
> Failure to directly contact this list at the same time as imports is
> extremely discourteous.
This supposes that the data importer/ donor is are of this list.
> Changing of source tag is unacceptable for mapper surveyed locations.
The *addition* of a sou
At the risk of being completely behind what has already been posted (as
some of you know I have been preoccupied with other things), some quick
points:
- Failure to directly contact this list at the same time as imports is
extremely discourteous. Particularly so as many UK/GB mappers will no
Hi,
On 13.05.2017 17:17, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 12 May 2017 at 10:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>>> 1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
>>
>> It's not OSM-UK that proposes this import
>
> Nor is it OSM-UK who are importing tree data.
True, let me rephrase:
"It isn't director
On 12 May 2017 at 10:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> 1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
>
> It's not OSM-UK that proposes this import
Nor is it OSM-UK who are importing tree data.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
__
: 12 May 2017 08:58:06
To: talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Proposed Import of UK Shell Filling Stations
On 11 May 2017 at 23:25, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Link to discussion so far on imports@:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-May/004956.html
>
>> My concern would b
Apologies to Brian, who's clearly just passing on the message.
On 12/05/2017 00:58, Dave F wrote:
1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
2. What does ref_unused_tags.name refer to?
3. Are there any out of date stations that need removing/changing to
another operator?
DaveF
Dave,
On 12.05.2017 01:58, Dave F wrote:
> 1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
It's not OSM-UK that proposes this import; Brian has only pointed out
that there's a discussion going on. The import has been proposed by
commercial entities NavAds (who publicize store locations for
for background info: a couple of links about Navads and what they do for
Shell (and other brands)
http://www.prweb.com/releases/navads/shell/prweb13779126.htm and
https://navads.eu/businesslistings/
It would be interesting for OSM[UK] to be an official recipient of
up-to-date, clean data if indeed
On 11 May 2017 at 23:25, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Link to discussion so far on imports@:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-May/004956.html
>
>> My concern would be from where to they get their geocoding. Most
>> businesses, and particularly chain businesses, tend to use postc
1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first?
2. What does ref_unused_tags.name refer to?
3. Are there any out of date stations that need removing/changing to
another operator?
DaveF
On 11/05/2017 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
There is a proposal for this import currentl
Also need to check for "shop=convenience / name=Shell" in the vicinity
-- not necessarily just "amenity=fuel"
Neil
On 11/05/2017 22:47, David Woolley wrote:
On 11/05/17 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote:
There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the
talk import mailing list a
Hi,
On 05/11/2017 11:47 PM, David Woolley wrote:
> On 11/05/17 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote:
>> There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the
>> talk import mailing list and the OSMUK chapter has asked the proposer
>> that it be discussed on the talk GB mailing list
Link to
On 11/05/17 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote:
There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the
talk import mailing list and the OSMUK chapter has asked the proposer
that it be discussed on the talk GB mailing list
My concern would be from where to they get their geocoding. Most
Hi everyone
There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the talk
import mailing list and the OSMUK chapter has asked the proposer that it be
discussed on the talk GB mailing list
Regards
Brian
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@open
15 matches
Mail list logo
