Richard Fairhurst richard@... writes:
It's not so much a rendering bug, more a tagging
discrepancy. The railway
stations in question are those tagged as
railway=station; disused=yes
There are those who say (and I can see their point)
that this is a really
dumb way of tagging
Has anybody else noticed / been annoyed by the way that disused railway
stations are rendered just like regular railway stations on the cycle
map, transport map and MapQuest open views of OSM?
Mapnik seems to know the difference and renders the disused stations
with a smaller symbol and grey
One in London has had disused: put in front of the tags
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1528661184
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Bogus Zaba bog...@bogzab.plus.com wrote:
Has anybody else noticed / been annoyed by the way that disused railway
stations are rendered just like
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Has anybody else noticed / been annoyed by the way that disused railway
stations are rendered just like regular railway stations on the cycle map,
transport map and MapQuest open views of OSM?
I think disused railways and raillines that are not visible
4 matches
Mail list logo
