On 16/6/20 7:43 am, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2020-06-15 23:14, barry b wrote:
Hi Folks, I made the below changes to rockall.
snip
I don't know the exact procedure here. I feel i didn't do it right.
Don't worry too much about "not doing it right", just about everybody
here has "been there done
On 2020-06-15 23:14, barry b wrote:
> Hi Folks, I made the below changes to rockall.
Thanks for engaging!
> The changes i've made are
> 1) Changed Rockall from Island to Rock
> 2) Removed the Administration boundary
>
> 1) Rockall is not a island. You could debate its a rock or islet but
l the area in protection of fishery
>
> I can give a list of references to show the EEZ recognized, but i don't think
> that helpful
>
> I don't know the exact procedure here. I feel i didn't do it right.
>
> Happy to discuss further.
> Cheers
> Barry
>
> ______
recognized, but i don't think
that helpful
I don't know the exact procedure here. I feel i didn't do it right.
Happy to discuss further.
Cheers
Barry
From: Colin Smale
Sent: Monday 15 June 2020 21:39
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rockall
I just
I just pointed the user concerned to the signup page to this mailing
list, so he should be here soon! Further to my earlier message I will
not make any changes to Rockall until we have had the discussion.
Colin___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 2020-06-15 15:36, Mark Goodge wrote:
> I'd just revert it.
I'll give them until tomorrow to see if there is any further engagement.
Otherwise I will fix it up as place=islet and resurrecting the coastline
and admin boundaries.
Colin___
Talk-GB
On 15/06/2020 10:23, Colin Smale wrote:
A new mapper has changed the status of Rockall, removing it from the UK
admin boundaries. As I understand it Rockall is accepted as UK territory
although it can't be used as a baseline to extend the EEZ. I contacted
the mapper with a changeset comment
e 2020 13:53
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Rockall
In situations like this I'd invite the new mapper to discuss things more widely
(which Colin has already done on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86624359 ) and then revert the changes
pending any discussion here.
T
In situations like this I'd invite the new mapper to discuss things more
widely (which Colin has already done on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86624359 ) and then revert the
changes pending any discussion here.
The new mapper is already aware of the changeset discussion (they've
Probably? I am not familiar with the disputed territories process for Osm.
It’s a weird one as only the U.K. has claimed sovereignty. Others don’t accept
the claim, but also haven’t made a sovereignty claim themselves. So at the
moment, the U.K. is the administrator - and there is an absence of
A new mapper has changed the status of Rockall, removing it from the UK
admin boundaries. As I understand it Rockall is accepted as UK territory
although it can't be used as a baseline to extend the EEZ. I contacted
the mapper with a changeset comment and their motivation is based on
"fixing the
11 matches
Mail list logo
