On 11/03/19 09:02, Martin Wynne wrote:
On 10/03/2019 21:33, Edward Catmur wrote:
Changesets have a timestamp attached (the time when you hit upload in
the
editor, I guess), so the community (other mappers and data consumers)
can
usually assume that the survey date is more or less the same as t
Yes, that would be fine. You might also consider breaking up the edit into
multiple uploads each with an appropriate source tag - this may be a bit
tricky depending on which editor you use, though.
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, 22:02 Martin Wynne, wrote:
> On 10/03/2019 21:33, Edward Catmur wrote:
> > Ch
On 10/03/2019 21:33, Edward Catmur wrote:
Changesets have a timestamp attached (the time when you hit upload in the
editor, I guess), so the community (other mappers and data consumers) can
usually assume that the survey date is more or less the same as the
changeset timestamp.
Thanks. But a ch
Changesets have a timestamp attached (the time when you hit upload in the
editor, I guess), so the community (other mappers and data consumers) can
usually assume that the survey date is more or less the same as the
changeset timestamp.
Adding survey date would be redundant unless it's more than a
Every changeset has a date automatically added to it, if your survey is
much earlier than the data you make the edit maybe it's worth noting the
difference.
cheers
Chris Hill (chillly)
On 10/03/2019 21:24, Martin Wynne wrote:
I'm minded to start adding
survey:date=
to some of my mapping (
I'm minded to start adding
survey:date=
to some of my mapping (if you can call climbing over a stile surveying
it). I've noticed on repeat visits that things do change quite a lot,
and I can't guarantee to go back and keep everything I map up to date.
But I'm puzzled by the wiki, which says
6 matches
Mail list logo
