Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
Jun 21, 2020, 03:54 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > > > > Jun 21, 2020, 01:28 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > >> We think in particular that a significant part of the cycle parking data >> (generally the residential areas, where there is little parking presently) >> and the speed bump

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-21 Thread David Woolley
On 21/06/2020 13:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: Is it ok for pedestrians to walk on the carriageway and cross the road together with cyclists in place marked by bicycle paintings? It's legal for them to do so, which is what determines access. They don't get any priority. ___

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-21 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
21 Jun 2020, 12:07 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk: > On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: > >> >> >> >> Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >>> You’ll remember that a couple of we

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-21 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: > > > Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > > You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the > > > work I’m doing to look at getting the

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-21 Thread Stephen Colebourne
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 00:29, Martin - CycleStreets wrote: > Speed bumps: > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=bumps_road/#14.98/51.47101/-0.02755 There isn't a "bumps_new" filter at present, so it is hard to see what is to be added. I've already added a lot of traffic calming in m

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the work I’m doing >> to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport for London’s openly >> licensed Cycle Infrastruc

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
Jun 21, 2020, 01:28 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > > Speed bumps: > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=bumps_road/#14.98/51.47101/-0.02755 > > Cycle parking: > https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=parking_new/#14.98/51.46059/-0.05586 > RWG197392 https://api

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB
Jun 21, 2020, 01:28 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net: > We think in particular that a significant part of the cycle parking data > (generally the residential areas, where there is little parking presently) > and the speed bumps data are ripe for automated conversion. These form tens > of

[Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi Martin, Looks and sounds good to me. From what I've seen looking at the data in the past, and again now using your visualisation, both speed bumps and cycle parking look good to import. Out of interest, I did spot that the original data (from TfLs ground survey with two photos) did look slight

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Martin - CycleStreets
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Some of it can go into OSM in a more-or-less automated fashion. This is particularly true of the cycle parking, and of most speed bumps. Richard and I would welcome views on this. We think in particular that a significant part of the cycle parki

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-06-20 Thread Martin - CycleStreets
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Richard Fairhurst wrote: You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the work I’m doing to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport for London’s openly licensed Cycle Infrastructure Database into OSM. https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-04-28 Thread Brian Prangle
Hi everyone Thanks Richard for the huge effort you've put into this ( and Martin) . I'm happy to help with any manual editing as long as the data is ready-to-go in JOSM. I think that this is such a vote of confidence in OSM by TfL - and such a potential global case study - that it warrants a big U

Re: [Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-04-27 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi Richard, Hi all, (Sorry for not replying properly to the thread - I don't receive the emails into my inbox and nabble is complaining about a broken certificate today) It sounds like you are making good progress. Thanks for all the written documentation for those, like myself, who are not so go

[Talk-GB] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database - matching against OSM

2020-04-26 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Hi folks, You’ll remember that a couple of weeks ago I posted about the work I’m doing to look at getting the relevant bits of Transport for London’s openly licensed Cycle Infrastructure Database into OSM. I’ve now pushed the in-progress code to github: https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-c