Hello All,
If anybody can tell me how to go about rectifying break in Rackenford
Road in the following area
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.996550321579&lon=-3.73412847518921&zoom=16
I'd be very grateful. That discontinuity has been bugging me for a few
weeks. I can see it a background la
On 25 September 2012 14:23, Brad Rogers wrote:
> If anybody can tell me how to go about rectifying break in Rackenford
> Road in the following area
>
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.996550321579&lon=-3.73412847518921&zoom=16
>
> I'd be very grateful.
>
The data within OpenStreetMap appe
Delete and redraw? I've tweaked it slightly and some things have
re-rendered. But it is a bit odd.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jason Cunningham
wrote:
>
>
> On 25 September 2012 14:23, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>> If anybody can tell me how to go about rectifying break in Rackenford
>> Road in t
To: Jason Cunningham
Cc: TalkGB ML
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] This one is driving me potty
Delete and redraw? I've tweaked it slightly and some things have
re-rendered. But it is a bit odd.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jason Cunningham
wrote:
On 25 September 2012 14:23, Brad Rogers wro
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:24:18 +0100
Richard Mann wrote:
Hello Richard,
>Delete and redraw? I've tweaked it slightly and some things have
>re-rendered. But it is a bit odd.
I think I may have tweaked myself, but can't remember (it was a while
ago) exactly what I did. Thanks to you, Ed and Jason
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:17:44 +0100
"Gregory Williams" wrote:
Hello Gregory,
>I guess that for some reason or another the previous version of the
>node, or at least the line geometry for the road which used it, was
>still stored in the backing Postgres database used for rendering. Hence
>it was b
stage a little ahead of actually generating the
updated map image.
Cheers,
Gregory
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Rogers [mailto:b...@fineby.me.uk]
> Sent: 25 September 2012 16:38
> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] This one is driving me potty
>
The waterways in the area of the road seemed also to cause a problem. I've
remapped them and they've now sorted themselves out
Jason
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/browse/node/1490142552/history
Ed
From: Gregory Williams [mailto:greg...@gregorywilliams.me.uk]
Sent: 25 September 2012 16:18
To: 'Richard Mann'; 'Jason Cunningham'
Cc: 'TalkGB ML'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] This one is driving me potty
I’ve managed to remo
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:43:08 +0100
"Ed Loach" wrote:
Hello Ed,
>There are further anomalies a little to the northwest:
>http://osm.org/go/euJg~OQQw-
Hmmm... IIRC, that was one of mime, too.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediate
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:35:34 +0100
Jason Cunningham wrote:
Hello Jason,
>The waterways in the area of the road seemed also to cause a problem.
>I've remapped them and they've now sorted themselves out
As they stood, they bore little relation to what's actually on the
ground. Same applies to lo
Brad Rogers wrote:
As they stood, they bore little relation to what's actually on the
ground. Same applies to lots of waterways in the area. I believe they
were loaded en mass from an open source data set, but I'm not sure.
"source=npe" suggests that they were traced from New Popular Edition
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:43 +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
> It’s almost as though the rendering database is missing a changeset
> (or a replication diff containing that changeset), possibly
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9728130
>
We just had a similar data error reported via trac wh
Jon wrote:
> We just had a similar data error reported via trac where another
> change
> was dropped within the same hour as this changeset:
>
> https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4591
>
> I looked back through various logs and it seems the machine
> holding the
> rendering database was reboo
14 matches
Mail list logo
