Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries - update

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Miller
On 28 Jul 2009, at 13:33, Chris Hill wrote: Why is this 'great'? What is the point of boundary=ceremonial? If you change a boundary=administrative to boundary=ceremonial what does this do except break existing renders and tools? If you *add* boundary=ceremonial then this is available fo

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries - update

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Hill
Why is this 'great'?  What is the point of boundary=ceremonial?  If you change a boundary=administrative to boundary=ceremonial what does this do except break existing renders and tools?  If you *add* boundary=ceremonial then this is available for those who want it and leave the existing bounda

Re: [Talk-GB] UK Boundaries - update

2009-07-28 Thread Brian Quinion
> 1) Complete the conversion from boundary=administrative -> > boundary=ceremonial for the ceremonial-only counties. I will do this > and also change the name of these to 'Blar (ceremonial)' to make a > clear distinction from the administrative boundary. Changing them to boundary=ceremonial is gre

[Talk-GB] UK Boundaries - update

2009-07-28 Thread Peter Miller
Progress on English boundaries has been amazing recently. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_England . Wales and Scotland seem to need champions and are not so far advanced for some reason. What is really good is that we now have people using them for useful purposes (see Peter