On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Peter Miller wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
I've noticed an odd thing. The top 4 items on the left at
That means they're fixed (the discrepancies are the ones on the right)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Derick Rethans o...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Peter Miller wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Peter Miller wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS Locator need to be
in OSM
Peter (I think) wrote:
To my mind one the main benefits of the bot I have suggested is
the reliable
attribution of content that comes with it. When a name is added
from os locator
then there is always a 'source:name=os locator' added as well so
anyone coming
along later knows. When
Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool.
One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an
option to rank the missing roads by their approximate
length/area*, rather simply alphabetically?
Targetting the largest incorrectly named roads first seems like a
good way to
On 7 February 2011 09:39, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Peter (I think) wrote:
To my mind one the main benefits of the bot I have suggested is
the reliable
attribution of content that comes with it. When a name is added
from os locator
then there is always a 'source:name=os locator'
On 7 February 2011 12:16, Graham Stewart gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool.
One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an option to
rank the missing roads by their approximate length/area*, rather simply
alphabetically?
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
What I don't see is any way to indicate that the information added could
benefit from a ground-survey. NaPTAN imports include the tag
NaPTAN:verified=no. Should we not have something similar for data
taken straight from OS Open data, regardless
On 7 February 2011 13:36, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.comwrote:
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
What I don't see is any way to indicate that the information added could
benefit from a ground-survey. NaPTAN imports include the tag
NaPTAN:verified=no. Should we not
How often are the tiles updated? It would be really useful if the analysis
map showed what date the tiles are from (well the data they are using) as I
have put a number of changes in and while the statistics have changed the
tiles remain the same, I'm guessing it's every few days?
However it's a
On 6 February 2011 16:43, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
How often are the tiles updated? It would be really useful if the analysis
map showed what date the tiles are from (well the data they are using) as I
have put a number of changes in and while the statistics have changed the
On 3 February 2011 17:32, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 03/02/2011 14:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
I wonder how much of that jump was people blindly copying names from the
OS anywhere it showed a difference...
That's exactly what happened round me. I had started work on surveying
On 20 January 2011 16:42, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS
We have been logging the data every month since we released it 9 months ago.
Initial analysis says that there was a jump when we introduced it, then
progress slowed down, and that it has jumped again since we did our recent
release with thematic mapping. I suspect that this rate will again slow.
On 03/02/11 14:27, Peter Miller wrote:
We have been logging the data every month since we released it 9 months
ago. Initial analysis says that there was a jump when we introduced it,
then progress slowed down, and that it has jumped again since we did our
recent release with thematic mapping.
On 3 February 2011 14:30, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 03/02/11 14:27, Peter Miller wrote:
We have been logging the data every month since we released it 9 months
ago. Initial analysis says that there was a jump when we introduced it,
then progress slowed down, and that it has
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS Locator need to be
in OSM and there are 17 districts which achieve that
Peter,
This is fantastic work, very helpful.
However, I suspect celtic areas are still suffering a problem with non-ASCII
characters. For example, Lon or Lôn should really be a minor error that
barely merits a mention:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/6075428
On 20 January 2011 15:42, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS
Andy Mabbett wrote:
An interesting piece of work. Scilly Isles, with 57 roads mapped, rank
higher than my home town, Birmingham, with 8,972 mapped.
ITYM the Scilly Isles, with 0 roads missing, rank higher than my home town,
Birmingham, with 206 roads missing.
Also,
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS Locator need to be in
OSM and there are 17 districts which achieve that
On 20 January 2011 16:50, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 20 January 2011 15:42, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a
thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different
On 20 January 2011 16:56, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
An interesting piece of work. Scilly Isles, with 57 roads mapped, rank
higher than my home town, Birmingham, with 8,972 mapped.
ITYM the Scilly Isles, with 0 roads missing, rank higher than my home
Andy Mabbett wrote:
Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is_the_glass_half_empty_or_half_full?
Touché. :)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Update-to-OSM-Analysis-tp5944227p5944598.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at
24 matches
Mail list logo
