From: Bogus Zaba
Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2014 05:40
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Only thing to avoid is an automated edit whereby all UK trunk roads
suddenly have a bicycle=yes tag since there are plenty of stretches
where this would be quite wrong (both in terms of legal status -
On 28/07/14 14:07, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
I must be missing something in your question, because what's wrong
with adding the sub tags bicycle/foot = yes/no? Some users have been
adding bicycle=no to UK motorways for this specific reasons.
This would appear to be the right way to do it and my
On 27/07/14 22:26, ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
So there should be a clear tagging that is distinct for the meaning
of “trunk (UK sense)” vs “trunk (International sense)
The logical conclusion of this would be that there would have to be a
different tag for every jurisdiction. In this
did they say when you sent feedback to them?
Regards,
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: David Woolley [mailto:for...@david-woolley.me.uk]
Sent: 28 July 2014 10:33 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] highway=trunk Roads and Cycle Navigation
On 27/07/14 22:26, ianmspen
David,
I’ve acknowledged this elsewhere and understand the problem better. I only had
the perspective from having been hit by this problem from several sources over
a number of years. I now realise it is a more general problem and am better
armed to help point the producers in the right
Hi
I must be missing something in your question, because what's wrong with
adding the sub tags bicycle/foot = yes/no? Some users have been adding
bicycle=no to UK motorways for this specific reasons.
General comments:
Something that's said many times before, but needs to be repeated: There
On 28 July 2014 14:07, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I must be missing something in your question, because what's wrong with
adding the sub tags bicycle/foot = yes/no? Some users have been adding
bicycle=no to UK motorways for this specific reasons.
Agree. I think renderers and routers
No, it is a miscasting the problem to suggest we don’t tag trunk roads (which
clearly was not part of the problem). The problem is that there is a tagging
system in place which is ambiguous from an International point of view. So
there should be a clear tagging that is distinct for the meaning
On 27/07/2014 22:26, ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that there is a tagging system in place which is
ambiguous from an International point of view.
It is indeed the case that when someone in Germany tags a trunk road the
default access rules are different to when someone in
On 25/07/14 17:15, Philip Barnes wrote:
Are you proposing we tag for the renderer by not tagging trunk roads as
trunk?
No. He wants people to tag for the router, not the renderer.
I think that is a bad idea, although not as bad when most trunk roads
weren't already mapped, as it is doing
On 25 Jul 2014, at 17:37, David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk wrote:
On 25/07/14 17:15, Philip Barnes wrote:
Are you proposing we tag for the renderer by not tagging trunk roads as
trunk?
No. He wants people to tag for the router, not the renderer.
I think that is a bad idea,
The trunk road tag on highway works differently in the UK from the usage in the
rest of the world and it seriously affects interpreting routing.
Essentially, in the UK it is understood that a highway=trunk will be
interpreted with the default of bicycle=yes and pedestrian=yes.
In the
12 matches
Mail list logo
