Andy Allan wrote:
> [2] Originally meaning "this is a legally declared 'Public
> Footpath', it was ambiguously confused with a general
> legal right of walking (e.g. on a bridleway). Automatic
> inclusion on all footpaths of any type by potlatch1 for
> a number of years
[Brief historical footn
On 15 January 2012 19:27, Ed Avis wrote:
> If you reposition the new node in same place as the old one, this hasn't
> really
> achieved anything. At best, it has obscured the history a bit so it's no
> longer
> quite so clear that the node was originally added by a CT-decliner.
It rarely ends
Andy Allan writes:
>>1.) Assume you need to replace a node which is in the intersection of
>>several ways.
>Using Potlatch 2, select the junction node and press "O". This deletes
>the node and attaches a new node to the cursor - you need to click to
>position it.
If you reposition the new node
On 14 January 2012 15:35, Eike Ritter wrote:
> I'm trying to do some remapping, and would be grateful for some help in
> situations I've encountered.
>
> 1.) Assume you need to replace a node which is in the intersection of
> several ways. If I simply delete the node and re-create it, I'd have to
Hi,
On 01/14/2012 04:35 PM, Eike Ritter wrote:
2.) Quite often the changes by a non-accepter are trivial (eg additional
tag "created by JOSM" is the only difference. What's the best way of
dealing with this? So far, I've left those nodes alone, but they will
still show in the OSM-inspector despi
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Eike Ritter wrote:
> 1.) Assume you need to replace a node which is in the intersection of
> several ways. If I simply delete the node and re-create it, I'd have to
> adjust all the ways the node is part of. This is slow and error-prone.
> Is there an easier way of achieving t
6 matches
Mail list logo
