Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map

2009-04-05 Thread Tom Hughes
Steve Chilton wrote: > I am afraid I don't know the answer. Yahoo surely have all the imagery, but > presumably have chosen to release this random coverage to OSM. Eh? We're using their standard imagery, not some special OSM released subset... Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.c

Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map

2009-04-05 Thread Steve Chilton
35 AM To: Steve Chilton Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Steve Chilton wrote: > Because I wanted to know, and as an exercise in OpenOverLayerIng, I > have pro

Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map

2009-04-05 Thread LeedsTracker
> You can see result at http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~steve8/yahoo.html Thanks for doing this. I knew their coverage wasn't great but surprised at just how sparse. > Interesting that St Helens should be on list and also within Y! coverage > but it looks to me that someone has done a lot of work t

Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map

2009-04-05 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 5 Apr 2009, at 09:24, Steve Chilton wrote: [...] Also good that mapping parties are starting to be arranged for these places (M Keynes and Sunderland already - Grimsby anyone? [zoom in on mapnik layer for full effect]). Are you setting a Grimsby mapping party up? Shaun _

Re: [Talk-GB] Yahoo coverage map

2009-04-05 Thread Steve Hill
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Steve Chilton wrote: > Because I wanted to know, and as an exercise in OpenOverLayerIng, I > have produced a map combining the extent of Yahoo aerial imagery > coverage in GB with an overlay of the significant places calculated to > be in most need of mapwork (from UK_Map_Pr