Rob Nickerson wrote:
> A few months ago I spotted an edit where a company employee was
> moving height restriction data from nodes to ways. This in itself is
> not wrong
Absolutely - the restriction is much better tagged on the way. It's a
property of the road just like a speed limit or
All,
The Advisory Board has now published this [1]. We have already had one
person respond in a way that makes it appear like it is a vote between the
two documents. May I re-iterate that this on it's own is not helpful. The
aim is to gather discussion responses that can aid further the OSMF
Hi all,
A success story:
A few months ago I spotted an edit where a company employee was moving
height restriction data from nodes to ways. This in itself is not wrong but
it could lead to errors if rushed (as it was in this case). It also felt
like editing for the routing engine.
I
Hi everyone
Message for Christina a tMapBox Amsterdam: I also wanted to share the happy
news that my colleagues from the Satellite team have updated tint and
colouring of the West Midlands imagery. It's not new imagery though, just
looks better. I hope this is of help at all
I've taken a look at
Hi,
I've just pushed a big update to the auditing service. You can now re-check
skipped objects. But the "skipped" flag is only stored since today. If you
want, Brian, I can reset your validation history for the entire project, so you
could re-check all stations.
Also I can grant you admin
5 matches
Mail list logo
