In particular, when submitting data obtained through employment, it has
to be clear that the company is the one that is agreeing to the
licensing terms, not the individual.
On 21/10/2019 12:47, David Woolley wrote:
I meant you should use an account that clearly belongs to the company. I
21 Oct 2019, 13:47 by for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
> I meant you should use an account that clearly belongs to the company. I
> guess you could have an account for each relevant employee, but that will
> cause problems when an employee changes job, either internally, or to another
> employer.
I meant you should use an account that clearly belongs to the company.
I guess you could have an account for each relevant employee, but that
will cause problems when an employee changes job, either internally, or
to another employer.
Definitely do not use the same account to submit personal
Thanks, David.
Discussion ongoing on the legal list, but FYI from Frederick Ramm, who
opines:
> PS: I would strongly advise against using a "corporate account" that
> groups the activities of many individuals as it makes communication
> between the group/company members and other members
On 18/10/2019 17:43, Edward Bainton wrote:
*If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the
work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*
I think it is true worldwide that employers have the copyright in work
for hire, and only they can licence the use of
Thanks, I'll repost.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 18:04, SK53 wrote:
> This really belongs on talk legal rather than talk-gb. The people
> qualified to answer such issues are more likely to be there, and it's
> rather specialised for this list.
>
> Certainly when I worked for a large company which
This really belongs on talk legal rather than talk-gb. The people qualified
to answer such issues are more likely to be there, and it's rather
specialised for this list.
Certainly when I worked for a large company which paid a great deal of
attention to such issues we would not have been able to
Hi all
Quick question arising from a 'lobbying' conversation:
*If an employee edits the map in the course of their employment, has the
work been adequately licensed to OSM/the big wide Open?*
According to Copyright Act 1988,
s. 11 (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [F1
8 matches
Mail list logo
