I apologise to everyone for making a mess of this thread’s title and replying
twice with the same content. I shall give myself one hundred lines (for those
who remember the punishment)!
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
It is fortunate for me that Oxfordshire County Council makes its Public Rights
of Way shown in its Countryside Access Map downloadable. I have been able to
load data in .kml format by civil parish to my ‘phone as an overlay to OSM and
follow the paths, track recording as I walk. This allows
It is fortunate for me that Oxfordshire County Council makes its Public Rights
of Way shown in its Countryside Access Map downloadable. I have been able to
load data in .kml format by civil parish to my ‘phone as an overlay to OSM and
follow the paths, track recording as I walk. This allows
What I have done in such situations is:
- Remove designation tags from the actually used paths. Access with
foot=yes is
- Add the formal line of the path with the designation tag and access
tags, but without highway tags.
Specific examples I've mapped in the past couple of years:
W
On 29 September 2017 at 14:35, Bob Hawkins wrote:
> I should be interested to learn the general consensus regarding definitive
> alignments of Public Rights of Way and paths actually walked, and whether
> contributors have similar predicaments to mine. I have two
I should be interested to learn the general consensus regarding definitive
alignments of Public Rights of Way and paths actually walked, and whether
contributors have similar predicaments to mine. I have two cases in Shiplake,
Oxfordshire:
1. Shiplake FP 37 Footpath #528052488 Changeset
6 matches
Mail list logo