> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access the meaning
> of access=no is "Access by this transport mode is not permitted,
> public does not have a right of way" but it's not clear to me
*which*
> mode of transport that sentence refers to.
>
> So, does "access=no" mean "no vehicula
It is actually tagged access=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, which is as it should
be, (I know this street) and has been since March (previously it was tagged
bicycle=true, which should be Boolean equivalent anyway)
PHILLIP BARNETT
SERVER MANAGER
200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
LONDON
WC1X 8XZ
UNITED KINGD
On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:03, Ed Loach wrote:
> Reading further down the wiki page, access= is a general term which
> includes foot as a sub-level of the hierarchy. The road should
> probably be tagged access=no, foot=yes (assuming that is the case).
> In this case I'd say Cloudmade's route planner is
On 05/07/2010 09:03, Ed Loach wrote:
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access the meaning
of access=no is "Access by this transport mode is not permitted,
public does not have a right of way" but it's not clear to me
*which*
mode of transport that sentence refers to.
So, does
On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:16, Barnett, Phillip wrote:
> It is actually tagged access=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, which is as it should
> be, (I know this street) and has been since March (previously it was tagged
> bicycle=true, which should be Boolean equivalent anyway)
Thanks for that Phillip. That
On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:31, Tim Morley wrote:
> I need to report a bug to CloudMade in their pedestrian route finder, I
> think. I shall do it now.
For reference:
http://developers.cloudmade.com/issues/show/658
Tim
___
Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list
