-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I don't really have too strong an opinion on this. If I were doing it
from scratch, I'd prefer to leave out the Barony of etc., since as
John points out, it /should/ be deducable from the object.
However, we have had County in county names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here. Are you asking about how
the objects should be named in OSM? Or are you looking for a way to
display a map with guaranteed to have a Barony of prefix?
If it's the later, I could update the
Having said all that, I just realised that Counties are name = County
Kildare and loc_name = Kildare. So there is a precedent for the
additional text and Barony of seems as justifiable as County to
me. I'm happy to adopt whatever the consensus is.
Thanks,
- John.
PS I know some people who
Brian thanks for raising this point - may I broaden it a little?
I too noticed that some mappers include ED and Civil Parish but
actually many do not and I haven't noticed any guidance on this
anywhere for the moment. So it would be good to come to a consensus on
these terms also.
Thinking about
