Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

> so something should be defined and documented I agree with my fellow mappers. There is no need to add this to the UK tagging guideline. > motorways indicated by the international chop sticks sign That is brilliant. I have to find a way to use that expression somewhere :-) P.S. I wish other

Re: [talk-au] Victorian Street names source?

On 30/04/18 07:38, John Berkers wrote: Which editor are you using? iD, JOSM, and Vespucci - depending on where and what I'm trying to do. JOSM has an imagery layer for VicMap which shows street names from LASSI.  LASSI is more generally available here:

Re: [OSM-ja] 高速道路の定義について(まとめページ)

松澤です。 とりあえず > 　・OSMの道路標示は日本人には馴染みの薄い配色なので、初めてOSMを目にし た 人にとっては違和感を感じる。特に道路のレベル認識で錯覚を生じさせる。 ここがひっかかったんですが、しばらく特に対応しなくて良さそうなら そうしておきます。 どっちにしろ、タイルサーバとosm.jpのリプレイスとSOTMJPの準備(あと、本の執筆も...)で首がまわらない状態なので、 いろいろやっていくのもSOTMJPの後になる予定です。 # まぁその頃にはFOSS4G Asiaに向けた準備とか入ってくるんだろうけどw あと、いちおう独自レンダリングはできているようですが、

[OSM-talk-fr] Carte vectoriel des transports en commun

Bonsoir, Je viens de pousser en ligne la carte du métro sur paris & tram en ile de france (pour l'instant) https://wadouk.github.io/osm-public-transports/ C'est en vectoriel, donc cliquable. Les couleurs sont celles d'osm. Les éléments en bordeaux sont ceux où je n'ai pas réussi à déterminer la

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

By not implicitly signed I mean there is no number on a NSL sign, the limit changes between 60/70 when roads change between single and dual carriageways and there is no explicit 70 sign on motorways. Phil (trigpoint) On 30 April 2018 20:31:11 BST, Adam Snape wrote:

[Talk-cz] FOto rozcestníků nejde nahrát

Upload mi hlásí: Chyba serveru! Fotografii se nepodařilo uložit na server. Detail: No bbox provided. Fňuk, po dlouhé době jsem něco vyfotil a nemůžu se pochlubit Předem díky za nápravu Vašek___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Also, I don't think we need a special tagging scheme just because each individual road is not signed. We don't do so for analogous restrictions such weight, width or access restrictions which are generally only signed when entering or leaving the zone where the restriction applies. Adam On 30

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

I'm not sure I'd call any of the national speed limits implicit. All are explicit in that they are (or should be) physically signed at least where the limit changes, so they are verifiable rather than merely implied. The only practical difference is whether small repeater signs are required to

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

For practical purposes the only non-implicitly signed speed limits are national speed limits, (start indicated by black diagonal on white) and motorways indicated by the international chop sticks sign. Phil (trigpoint) On 30 April 2018 19:54:37 BST, Tobias Zwick wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Whilst in theory there is an implicit 30mph when street lights are present and there are no repeater signs indicating a higher limit then the speed limit is 30 mph. It has nothing to do with urban, the same rule will apply on lit rural roads. These days it is complicated by 20mph limits which

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

I apologize for the misunderstanding, this is about implicit speed limits when there is *no sign* that ordains another speed limit, of course. Cheers Tobias On 30/04/2018 20:50, Brian Prangle wrote: > You can't make that assumption of an implicit 30mph limit. Major roads > in in built up areas

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

You can't make that assumption of an implicit 30mph limit. Major roads in in built up areas can be 40 mph and increasingly speed limits are being reduced to 20mph in built up areas Regards Brian On 30 April 2018 at 18:41, Tobias Zwick wrote: > Hi there > > On tagging

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Bonjour, J'utilise la version de F-droid sur mon Meizu Pro 5 en Android 5.1 n'ayant pas les services Google. Cédric Le 30/04/2018 à 20:25, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > Selon https://f-droid.org/packages/me.guillaumin.android.osmtracker/, > Android 2.2. > > Je suppose que vous

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Selon https://f-droid.org/packages/me.guillaumin.android.osmtracker/, Android 2.2. Je suppose que vous utilisez f-droid et pas Google Play. Je ne sais si c'est la dernière version disponible dans le magasin de Big Brother. Jean-Yvon ___ Talk-fr

Re: [Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

The UK definition of a "built-up area" for traffic purposes is still occasionally subject to discussions [1] In 99.9% of the cases the speed limit will be signed explicitly anyway. --colin [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Built-up_area_(Highway_Code)#Legal_definition On 2018-04-30 19:41,

Re: [OSM-co] Resumen de Talk-co, Vol 117, Envío 8

vices | American > Red Cross* > > *Av Cra 68 No. 66 B 31 | Bogotá, Colombia* > > *Skype: g...@amcross.org <g...@amcross.org>* > > *Celular: 3134338220* > próxima parte > Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... > URL: <http://lists.open

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

Yesss se vi va, mappiamo fin quanto possiamo. Ed approposito. Io sono arrivato! - M.P. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Lazio-f5372285.html ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-GB] Implicit speed limits: What to tag in built-up areas?

Hi there On tagging implicit speed limits in the United Kingdom, the wiki lists the following values [1] for "maxspeed:type": GB:nsl_single (=60 mph), GB:nsl_dual (=70 mph) and GB:motorway (=70 mph) I understand that the current legislation defines a road with road-lighting as a built-up area

Re: [OSM-co] Validacion de Tareas!

Hola, Para poder ayudar a validar tareas deben poner a las personas que queramos validar como validadores en el task manager del hot. Mi usuario es Kleper puedo ayudar a validar si me ponen ese perfil. Saludos. El lun., 30 de abr. de 2018 12:07 PM, Alejandra Diaz < alejan...@geo-thinking.com>

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

Beh io una birra la prendo. Anzi un bicchiere di vino eheheh Il 30 apr 2018 2:02 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:Quindi, cosa dite, micro mapping party, oppure solita geo-birra? A che ora?Ciao,Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

ok per me, hai ragione. Io ci posso essere. Chi altro verrebbe? Il giorno 30 aprile 2018 18:29, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > la domanda era se spostare a Mercoledì ore 18. > A ripensarci penso sarebbe molto tardi per spostare, anche se solitamente > non vengono

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

la domanda era se spostare a Mercoledì ore 18. A ripensarci penso sarebbe molto tardi per spostare, anche se solitamente non vengono molte persone, l'appuntamente di oggi è annunciato da circa un mese nel wiki. Direi sarebbe meglio avere un preavviso maggiore di 1,5 ore ;-) Io direi di vederci

[Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

Scusate ho mandato per errore solo a Martin Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > Date: 30 April 2018 at 18:16:47 CEST > To: Flaminia Tumino > Subject: Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile? >

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

io non sono fissato sul Lunedì, se avete altre preferenze / disponibilità andrebbe probabilmente bene uguale. Per me potremmo anche mappare dalle 8, visto che adesso fa caldo. E' tutto illuminato. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

Scusate ma se non possiamo mappare non è meglio scegliere un altro giorno in cui possiamo vederci un poco prima? tipo verso le sei? Fatemi sapere, comunque io per le otto ci potrei essere oggi se decidiamo di vederci comunque. Flaminia Il giorno 30 aprile 2018 14:02, Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [OSM-ja] 高速道路の定義について(まとめページ)

hayashiです 松澤さんレスありがとうございます。 私の案は「提案のやり方の例」として示したものです。 心配なさらなくともこの提案例に賛同する人は誰もいないと思います。 私自身はQiitaの記事を参考に独自レンダリングをしてリレーションを表示できていますので個人的には必要ないです。 https://qiita.com/nyampire/items/13ed805ac3ccaff3baf9 ちなみに、私のやり方はPostgisのosmテーブルのhighwayを リレーションのデータ に書き換える方法です。

[Talk-dk] autoAWS andet udkast (0.2)

Hej alle Tak for de mange gode input jeg løbende har modtaget angående kommende nyt script til adresseopdatering i Danmark. Flere kommentarer mv. modtages stadig gerne, enten via Wiki talk siden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:AutoAWS eller per email Jeg er kommet et stykke

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Prossimo incontro il 30 aprile?

Quindi, cosa dite, micro mapping party, oppure solita geo-birra? A che ora? Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Merci Vincent, Android 6.0, qui dit mieux ? *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux Le 30 avril 2018 à 11:21, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : > Salut François, > > > De: "François

Re: [Talk-it] MAPUTNIK E LEAFLET

2018-04-30 12:06 GMT+02:00 Roberto Brazzelli : > Ciao, riprendo una tua mail. > Per inserire file .json in leaflet con plugin > https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-leaflet > non serve anche avere i dati grezzi di osm? il file .json contiene solo lo > stile giusto? > Mi

Re: [Talk-it] MAPUTNIK E LEAFLET

Ciao, riprendo una tua mail. Per inserire file .json in leaflet con plugin https://github.com/mapbox/ mapbox-gl-leaflet non serve anche avere i dati grezzi di osm? il file .json contiene solo lo stile giusto? Mi manca forse qualche passaggio per visualizzare il lealfet la mappa di sfondo?

Re: [Talk-ca] Question

Hi, Thanks for the feedback! It helps a lot to have information from real world users. I looked into the data briefly. The data that _has been_ entered in OpenStreetMap looks correct. However, much data is not available. A brief explanation of what is happening: Postal codes are potentially

Re: [Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

2018-04-30 11:04 GMT+02:00 Alessandro : > a Genova ci sono diverse zone ZTL i cui cartelli indicano "accesso > consentito agli autorizzati" o una frase del genere. > In questo ricadono diverse categorie quali taxi, veicoli per disabili, > consegna merci provvisti di

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Salut François, > De: "François Lacombe" > > Quelle est la version minimale d'Android avec laquelle osmtracker est > compatible ? > Si vous avez une idée des minimum requirements en dehors de la > version de l'os je suis prenneur > > Ici ca tourne bien sur android 7

Re: [Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

On 30/04/18 11:04, Alessandro wrote: Idee? La butto lì, magari può essere un'idea il tipo di taggatura fatta per il Trentino sulle strade forestali di tipo B [0], ovvero quelle dove si accede solo con permesso. Però nel tu caso e ZTL in generale, forse è il caso di creare una relazione

[Talk-it] ZTL 'designated'

Ciao lista, a Genova ci sono diverse zone ZTL i cui cartelli indicano "accesso consentito agli autorizzati" o una frase del genere. In questo ricadono diverse categorie quali taxi, veicoli per disabili, consegna merci provvisti di autorizzazione, residenti provvisti di autorizzazione,

[OSM-talk-fr] Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Bonjour à tous, J'imagine qu'on est quelques uns à se servir d'OSMTracker sous Android ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:OSMTracker_(Android) Quelle est la version minimale d'Android avec laquelle osmtracker est compatible ? Si vous avez une idée des minimum requirements en dehors de la

[Talk-es] portales accesorio -CDAU

buen día si, los tipo accesorio son extensiones de portales que hay en algunos municipios,por ejemplo Málaga y Sevilla pero hay en más sitios, suelen corresponder a entradas de locales o garajes, naves etc saludos! paloma El 23/04/2018 a las 23:18, talk-es-requ...@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-es] #Importaciones2018: Importación del Catastro

Gracias Santiago. Dije que iba a hacerlo y me has ahorrado un montón de trabajo. Yo lo veo bien. Lo único que he cambiado es la aclaración inicial poniendo más énfasis en que [2] no contiene información actual y he añadido a la página de Cat2Osm2 una recomendación explícita de usar CatAtom2Osm

Re: [OSM-talk] Name:* tags in the local language

Multiple semicolon-separated values do not solve the main problem - figuring out the language of the "name" tag. If a region uses one value in the name tag, "default_language" should be set to just one language. If the whole region uses "xx - yy" convention in the name tag, default_language could