On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:15:47PM +, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 20:57, ael via Talk-GB
> wrote:
>
> > I would regard this as vandalism if it is removing surveyed real stiles
> > to suit an ideal world where they are not permitted on brid
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:30:01PM +, Neil Matthews wrote:
> Looks like there's been an attempt to remove all stiles from bridleways --
> pretty sure I've seen this done in other edits -- agree that they're a
> potential anomaly but should they really be a mechanical edit (even if by
> hand)?
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 09:11:32PM +, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
>
> What I'm wondering is how the typical recreational country walker would find
> that map, or get it on their mobile phone app in place of the awful Google
> maps? It's a lot of work to
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:44:24AM +, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
> IMHO, if it leads on to another road, track, etc. it is not a "driveway", but
> could be a track, a bridleway, a service road, or something else.
FWIIW, I would very definitely tag that as a service road. Driveway
seems
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 10:54:54PM +, ael via Talk-GB wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 09:11:32PM +, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote:
> >
> > something about myself, is to map and provide rendering for the area:highway
>
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 09:11:32PM +, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> something about myself, is to map and provide rendering for the area:highway
> tag:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
>
> Country walkers often need to include a
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 03:47:08PM +, David Woolley wrote:
> On 08/12/2020 15:11, nathan case wrote:
> > I am interested as a path I recently mapped is a PROW but is very dangerous
> > to cross. It is now marked as disused:highway=path with
> > access=discourged;designated but it is stilla
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:36:31AM +, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote:
> Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway (
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the
> WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have
> been in use recently,
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 02:21:43PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02, ael via Talk-GB
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
> > wrote:
> > > For anyone who's interested, I've just
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 12:11:42PM +, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at
> https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . It now includes food retail chains
> where OSM mapping doesn't agree with the "Retail Points" dataset from
>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 06:49:10PM +0100, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/2019 16:59, Silent Spike wrote:
> >
> > My understanding is that `public_transport=platform` is any place where
> > public transport can be accessed
>
> Same as bus_stop/tram_stop, you mean?
>
> > and should
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Neil Matthews wrote:
> Add a note on the main OSM site - maybe with expected finish date of
> road works -- might help as a reminder.
Oh yes. I ought to do that. I seldom generate notes, so I forget about
them.
ael
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:38:25PM +0100, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote:
> There is also the temporary affix:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)#Example_4:_Temporary_highway_bridge
Oh. I missed that. It would be perfect. Except, as
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> It is closed for repairs, so maybe highway=construction construction=primary
> would be better?
I thought about that. But changing from primary seemed more
problematical if it was forgotten.
> It seems that it will be
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:59:12PM -0400, Devonshire wrote:
> Saw this on the local news last night. A 30+ mile diversion is going to cause
> a few problems over Easter if they can't get it sorted. I am not that close
> but have mapped this area a bit in the past.
Personally. I like the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:23:03PM +0100, Dan S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose that for OSM in the UK we have a project to map
> solar electricity panels (photovoltaics or "PV").
>
> Why? In brief:
>
> * We can do this! It involves a nice mix of aerial imagery, local
> on-the-ground
With some hesitation, I have just added access = no to New Bridge
in Gunnislake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608610775
This is one of only two major routes across the lower Tamar, so it is
of major importance for routing applications.
The bridge has been closed after an accident damaged
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:40:23PM +, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> I think we should be encouraging those who add notes to contribute directly
> to the do-ocracy that is OSM. Quite a few notes take longer to type than
> actually editing the problem they are highlighting.
>
I think that you
18 matches
Mail list logo
