Why do routers need a node on the street? Next you'll be wanting me to
put a node on the street outside every house so you can route to a
house. This is a problem that should be solved by the router, not in
the data.
Richard
___
Talk-transit mailing
On 8 December 2010 20:44, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch wrote:
Hello
Yes, the Public Transport proposal is basically based on Oxomoa, but in
some details different.
I do not care about which of the two proposals will be approved. But I think
it is time to get a more exact schema
On 09.12.2010 13:31, Michał Borsuk wrote:
There is the issue of multiple relations per line in oxomoa, which
in my opinion is a total misfit. There are roles in relations, and
different variants of a route can be put there. Two, or more,
relations per line is not only illegal (clearly against
On 12/09/2010 01:31 PM, Michał Borsuk wrote:
On 8 December 2010 20:44, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) te...@teddy.ch
mailto:te...@teddy.ch wrote:
Hello
Yes, the Public Transport proposal is basically based on Oxomoa,
but in some details different.
I do not care about which of the
On 12/09/2010 06:35 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
Hi Michael
In the new proposal I am missing some details on how to build relations:
1. Should the outward and return trip be represented as two separate
relations, as a single relation or is that up to the mapper?
Each direction should
On 12/10/2010 01:45 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
highway=bus_stop on a node next to a road
railway=tram_stop on a node on railway=tram
railway=platform on a node or way or area next to the tram tracks
This is how you are using it.
It is inconsistent.
It is incomplete.
It is historic.
Beside your
