[Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Hello all, I note with some alarm the very complex, relation-heavy proposal for mapping simple public transport objects. Could I have your assurance that the proponents of this proposal will also be providing good-quality patches for the three principal editors (Potlatch, JOSM,

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Richard Mann
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Hello all, I note with some alarm the very complex, relation-heavy proposal for mapping simple public transport objects. We don't appear to have got beyond the is this really necessary question yet. At the moment

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread André Joost
Am 13.01.11 13:27, schrieb Richard Fairhurst: Hello all, I note with some alarm the very complex, relation-heavy proposal for mapping simple public transport objects. No need to panic, you don't *have* to use relations. Putting the node for a bus_stop on the correct place (that is where you

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Chris Hill
After reading the complexity of the proposal for something as simple as a bus stop I thought I should stress something that I believe as important: Mappers are precious. There has been some discussion on IRC about this proposal and these are few of the comments: /These proposal-twiddlers

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Richard Fairhurst
André Joost wrote: No need to panic, you don't *have* to use relations. I'm not panicking as a mapper. As a mapper I have exactly 0.0 interest in mapping bus stops. I'm anxious as an editor (co-)author. If such relations become widespread, they will (without explicit support) appear in

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/13/2011 01:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Hello all, I note with some alarm the very complex, relation-heavy proposal for mapping simple public transport objects. Suddenly I am not all alone? Greetings, LMB ___ Talk-transit mailing list

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Am 13.01.2011 21:33, Michał Borsuk: On 13 January 2011 13:59, André Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de mailto:andre%2bjo...@nurfuerspam.de wrote: Am 13.01.11 13:27, schrieb Richard Fairhurst: Could I have your assurance that the proponents of this proposal will

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed Feature - 2nd RFC - Public Transport

2011-01-13 Thread Tobias Knerr
Dominik Mahrer wrote: One month ago I already posted an RFC on this proposal. In the meantime I got plenty of comments and I have extended/corrected/rewritten nearly the whole proposal. I'm not very happy with the extensive use of relations. Especially nested relations strongly suggest that

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread Carsten Schönert
Hello Am 13.01.2011 21:57, schrieb Michał Borsuk: Somewhere besides the Doctors in Greece, the OpenPisteMap and the Japanese 50 sounds order presets. A preset could help testing the proposal You must be kidding me. The proposal is in the stage of a DISCUSSION, not even

Re: [Talk-transit] Public transport proposal

2011-01-13 Thread André Joost
Am 13.01.11 21:33, schrieb Michał Borsuk: On 13 January 2011 13:59, André Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.deandre%2bjo...@nurfuerspam.de wrote: Am 13.01.11 13:27, schrieb Richard Fairhurst: Could I have your assurance that the proponents of this proposal will also be providing good-quality